PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EPGAX vs. VOO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EPGAX vs. VOO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Equity Growth Fund Class A (EPGAX) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EPGAX achieves a 9.19% return, which is significantly higher than VOO's 8.08% return. Over the past 10 years, EPGAX has outperformed VOO with an annualized return of 17.36%, while VOO has yielded a comparatively lower 15.60% annualized return.


EPGAX

1D
-2.47%
1M
-2.08%
YTD
9.19%
6M
7.74%
1Y
20.56%
3Y*
17.34%
5Y*
9.81%
10Y*
17.36%

VOO

1D
-0.10%
1M
-1.44%
YTD
8.08%
6M
6.78%
1Y
22.23%
3Y*
20.75%
5Y*
13.02%
10Y*
15.60%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EPGAX vs. VOO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EPGAX
Fidelity Advisor Equity Growth Fund Class A
9.19%14.27%15.57%35.25%-24.67%22.66%43.38%33.69%-0.04%34.83%
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
8.08%17.82%24.98%26.32%-18.17%28.79%18.32%31.37%-4.50%21.77%

Correlation

The correlation between EPGAX and VOO is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.93

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.92

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.94

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.92

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 9, 2010

0.92

The correlation between EPGAX and VOO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EPGAX vs. VOO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EPGAX
EPGAX Risk / Return Rank: 2626
Overall Rank
EPGAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2525
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EPGAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2222
Sortino Ratio Rank
EPGAX Omega Ratio Rank: 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
EPGAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2727
Calmar Ratio Rank
EPGAX Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank

VOO
VOO Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
VOO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VOO Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
VOO Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
VOO Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
VOO Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EPGAX vs. VOO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Equity Growth Fund Class A (EPGAX) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


EPGAXVOODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.52

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.68

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.33

-0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.78

2.51

-0.73

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.53

11.16

-4.63

EPGAX vs. VOO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EPGAX Sharpe Ratio is 1.28, which is comparable to the VOO Sharpe Ratio of 1.80. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EPGAX and VOO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

EPGAX vs. VOO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EPGAX drawdown since its inception was -63.20%, which is greater than VOO's maximum drawdown of -33.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EPGAX and VOO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EPGAXVOODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-63.20%

-33.99%

-29.21%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.67%

-8.90%

-3.77%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-30.60%

-18.69%

-11.91%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.60%

-24.52%

-6.08%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-31.17%

-33.99%

+2.82%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.34%

-3.23%

-2.11%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-16.22%

-3.68%

-12.54%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.45%

2.00%

+1.45%

Volatility

EPGAX vs. VOO - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Advisor Equity Growth Fund Class A (EPGAX) has a higher volatility of 7.52% compared to Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) at 4.80%. This indicates that EPGAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VOO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EPGAXVOODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.52%

4.80%

+2.72%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.24%

9.79%

+4.45%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.65%

12.43%

+5.22%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.00%

16.91%

+4.09%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.92%

18.02%

+2.90%

EPGAX vs. VOO - Expense Ratio Comparison

EPGAX has a 0.97% expense ratio, which is higher than VOO's 0.03% expense ratio.


Dividends

EPGAX vs. VOO - Dividend Comparison

EPGAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.57%, less than VOO's 1.05% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EPGAX
Fidelity Advisor Equity Growth Fund Class A
0.57%0.62%0.00%0.56%2.26%12.86%12.06%9.56%7.10%12.35%6.39%2.37%
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
1.05%1.13%1.24%1.46%1.69%1.25%1.54%1.88%2.06%1.78%2.02%2.10%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.93, EPGAX and VOO move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

EPGAX has higher volatility (7.52%) compared to VOO (4.80%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EPGAX dropped -63.20% vs VOO's -33.99%.

VOO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.80 vs 1.28), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EPGAX and VOO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer