EPGAX vs. FATEX
Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity Advisor Equity Growth Fund Class A (EPGAX) and Fidelity Advisor Technology Fund Class M (FATEX).
EPGAX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Sep 3, 1996. FATEX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Sep 3, 1996.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: EPGAX or FATEX.
Key characteristics
| EPGAX | FATEX | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 30.56% | 32.45% |
| 1Y Return | 43.11% | 41.33% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 9.22% | 3.10% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 20.13% | 16.93% |
| 10Y Return (Ann) | 16.54% | 13.98% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 2.82 | 1.84 |
| Sortino Ratio | 3.67 | 2.40 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.50 | 1.32 |
| Calmar Ratio | 0.83 | 1.78 |
| Martin Ratio | 15.80 | 8.62 |
| Ulcer Index | 2.80% | 4.99% |
| Daily Std Dev | 15.72% | 23.38% |
| Max Drawdown | -95.79% | -82.59% |
| Current Drawdown | -33.49% | 0.00% |
Correlation
The correlation between EPGAX and FATEX is 0.89, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
EPGAX vs. FATEX - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, EPGAX achieves a 30.56% return, which is significantly lower than FATEX's 32.45% return. Over the past 10 years, EPGAX has outperformed FATEX with an annualized return of 16.54%, while FATEX has yielded a comparatively lower 13.98% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
EPGAX vs. FATEX - Expense Ratio Comparison
EPGAX has a 0.97% expense ratio, which is lower than FATEX's 1.21% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
EPGAX vs. FATEX - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Equity Growth Fund Class A (EPGAX) and Fidelity Advisor Technology Fund Class M (FATEX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
EPGAX vs. FATEX - Dividend Comparison
EPGAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.43%, while FATEX has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EPGAX Fidelity Advisor Equity Growth Fund Class A | 0.43% | 0.56% | 2.26% | 12.86% | 12.06% | 9.56% | 7.10% | 12.35% | 6.39% | 4.74% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FATEX Fidelity Advisor Technology Fund Class M | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 4.60% | 8.70% | 1.18% |
Drawdowns
EPGAX vs. FATEX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EPGAX drawdown since its inception was -95.79%, which is greater than FATEX's maximum drawdown of -82.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EPGAX and FATEX. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
EPGAX vs. FATEX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Fidelity Advisor Equity Growth Fund Class A (EPGAX) is 4.23%, while Fidelity Advisor Technology Fund Class M (FATEX) has a volatility of 6.11%. This indicates that EPGAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FATEX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.