EPEM vs. USO
EPEM (Harbor Emerging Markets Equity ETF) and USO (United States Oil Fund LP) are both exchange-traded funds - EPEM is a Emerging Markets Diversified fund actively managed by Harbor, while USO is a Oil & Gas fund tracking the Front Month Light Sweet Crude Oil. EPEM is actively managed, while USO is passively managed. At a correlation of -0.28, they often move in opposite directions. EPEM charges 0.84%/yr vs 0.86%/yr for USO.
Performance
EPEM vs. USO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EPEM achieves a 28.50% return, which is significantly lower than USO's 97.72% return.
EPEM
- 1D
- -0.80%
- 1M
- 4.68%
- YTD
- 28.50%
- 6M
- 31.04%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
USO
- 1D
- -2.92%
- 1M
- -5.15%
- YTD
- 97.72%
- 6M
- 91.54%
- 1Y
- 97.20%
- 3Y*
- 28.78%
- 5Y*
- 23.67%
- 10Y*
- 3.57%
EPEM vs. USO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
EPEM Harbor Emerging Markets Equity ETF | 28.50% | 20.76% |
USO United States Oil Fund LP | 97.72% | -1.10% |
Correlation
The correlation between EPEM and USO is -0.28, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 6, 2025 | -0.28 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EPEM vs. USO — Risk / Return Rank
EPEM
USO
EPEM vs. USO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Harbor Emerging Markets Equity ETF (EPEM) and United States Oil Fund LP (USO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EPEM | USO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 2.21 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.66 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.09 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 2.88 | -0.18 | +3.06 |
Drawdowns
EPEM vs. USO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EPEM drawdown since its inception was -13.27%, smaller than the maximum USO drawdown of -98.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EPEM and USO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EPEM | USO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -13.27% | -98.19% | +84.92% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -20.39% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -26.05% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -36.23% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -86.75% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.48% | -85.45% | +82.97% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.96% | -75.30% | +73.34% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 10.84% | — |
Volatility
EPEM vs. USO - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EPEM | USO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 14.97% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 38.35% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.36% | 44.32% | -24.96% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.36% | 36.09% | -16.73% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.36% | 39.00% | -19.64% |
EPEM vs. USO - Expense Ratio Comparison
EPEM has a 0.84% expense ratio, which is lower than USO's 0.86% expense ratio.
Dividends
EPEM vs. USO - Dividend Comparison
EPEM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.85%, while USO has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
EPEM Harbor Emerging Markets Equity ETF | 2.85% | 3.66% |
USO United States Oil Fund LP | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EPEM and USO have a correlation of -0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, EPEM is cheaper at 0.84% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
EPEM is cheaper with a 0.84% expense ratio, compared with 0.86% for USO.
EPEM has the higher dividend yield at 2.85%, compared with 0.00% for USO.
EPEM is categorized as Emerging Markets Diversified, while USO is Oil & Gas. They also come from different issuers: Harbor and USCF. Their fees differ too: 0.84% for EPEM and 0.86% for USO.
Find the right allocation for EPEM and USO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer