EPEM vs. PEMX

Last updated Aug 6, 2026

EPEM (Harbor Emerging Markets Equity ETF) and PEMX (Putnam Emerging Markets Ex-China ETF) are both Emerging Markets Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, EPEM returned 44.76% vs 50.99% for PEMX. Their correlation of 0.89 means they have usually moved in the same direction. EPEM charges 0.84%/yr vs 0.85%/yr for PEMX.

Performance

EPEM vs. PEMX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Harbor Emerging Markets Equity ETF (EPEM) and Putnam Emerging Markets Ex-China ETF (PEMX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EPEM achieves a 26.55% return, which is significantly lower than PEMX's 30.66% return.

EPEM

• 1D: -0.15%
• 1M: -0.13%
• 6M: 14.85%
• YTD: 26.55%
• 1Y: 44.76%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 43.82%

PEMX

• 1D: -0.11%
• 1M: -6.62%
• 6M: 17.14%
• YTD: 30.66%
• 1Y: 50.99%
• 3Y*: 30.76%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 30.64%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
EPEM Harbor Emerging Markets Equity ETF	$3.43K	$12.08K	$5.33K
PEMX Putnam Emerging Markets Ex-China ETF	$71.17K	$77.44K	$264.51K

EPEM vs. PEMX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
EPEM Harbor Emerging Markets Equity ETF	26.55%	20.73%
PEMX Putnam Emerging Markets Ex-China ETF	30.66%	23.83%

Correlation

The correlation between EPEM and PEMX is 0.90, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.90
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 5, 2025	0.89

The correlation between EPEM and PEMX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.

EPEM vs. PEMX - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	EPEM	PEMX
Technology	42.3%	49.1%
Financial Services	23.9%	24.1%
Consumer Cyclical	8.3%	3.8%
Consumer Defensive	6.2%	1.0%
Basic Materials	5.4%	1.5%
Communication Services	5.3%	6.0%
Energy	3.1%	0.9%
Industrials	2.7%	6.1%
Healthcare	1.7%	1.4%
Real Estate	1.1%	-
Utilities	-	3.7%

Return for Risk

EPEM vs. PEMX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

EPEM

EPEM Risk / Return Rank: 76
EPEM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 78
EPEM Sortino Ratio Rank: 70
EPEM Omega Ratio Rank: 77
EPEM Calmar Ratio Rank: 82
EPEM Martin Ratio Rank: 75

PEMX

PEMX Risk / Return Rank: 68
PEMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 72
PEMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 63
PEMX Omega Ratio Rank: 70
PEMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 68
PEMX Martin Ratio Rank: 68

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

EPEM vs. PEMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Harbor Emerging Markets Equity ETF (EPEM) and Putnam Emerging Markets Ex-China ETF (PEMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	EPEM	PEMX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.01	1.88	+0.14
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.61	2.40	+0.21
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.36	1.33	+0.03
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.39	2.69	+0.70
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	10.63	9.40	+1.23

EPEM vs. PEMX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EPEM Sharpe Ratio is 2.01, which is comparable to the PEMX Sharpe Ratio of 1.88. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EPEM and PEMX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

EPEM vs. PEMX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EPEM drawdown since its inception was -13.27%, smaller than the maximum PEMX drawdown of -19.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EPEM and PEMX.

Drawdown Indicators

	EPEM	PEMX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-13.27%	-19.04%	+5.77%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.27%	-19.04%	+5.77%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-19.04%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.96%	-11.63%	+7.67%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.49%	-3.14%	+0.65%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.22%	5.44%	-1.22%

Volatility

EPEM vs. PEMX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Harbor Emerging Markets Equity ETF (EPEM) is 6.57%, while Putnam Emerging Markets Ex-China ETF (PEMX) has a volatility of 10.04%. This indicates that EPEM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PEMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	EPEM	PEMX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.57%	10.04%	-3.47%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	19.79%	25.25%	-5.46%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	22.35%	27.33%	-4.98%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	21.16%	20.24%	+0.92%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.16%	20.24%	+0.92%

EPEM vs. PEMX - Expense Ratio Comparison

EPEM has a 0.84% expense ratio, which is lower than PEMX's 0.85% expense ratio.

Dividends

EPEM vs. PEMX - Dividend Comparison

EPEM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.90%, less than PEMX's 5.36% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
EPEM Harbor Emerging Markets Equity ETF	2.90%	3.66%	0.00%	0.00%
PEMX Putnam Emerging Markets Ex-China ETF	5.36%	7.00%	5.00%	0.72%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both EPEM and PEMX in my portfolio?

EPEM and PEMX have a correlation of 0.90, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, EPEM or PEMX?

PEMX has higher volatility (10.04%) compared to EPEM (6.57%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EPEM dropped -13.27% vs PEMX's -19.04%.

Which ETF is better, EPEM or PEMX?

On 1-year performance, PEMX leads with 50.99% vs 44.76% for EPEM. On fees, EPEM is cheaper at 0.84% per year. On volatility, EPEM has been the lower-risk option at 6.57%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, EPEM or PEMX?

Over the 1-year period, PEMX has performed better with a 50.99% return vs 44.76%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, EPEM or PEMX?

EPEM is cheaper with a 0.84% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for PEMX.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, EPEM or PEMX?

PEMX has the higher dividend yield at 5.36%, compared with 2.90% for EPEM.

What is the main difference between EPEM and PEMX?

They also come from different issuers: Harbor and Putnam. Their fees differ too: 0.84% for EPEM and 0.85% for PEMX.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

EPEM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.01 vs 1.88), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.