EPEM vs. BAMU

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

EPEM (Harbor Emerging Markets Equity ETF) and BAMU (Brookstone Ultra-Short Bond ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - EPEM is a Emerging Markets Diversified fund actively managed by Harbor, while BAMU is a Ultrashort Bond fund actively managed by Brookstone. Both are actively managed. At a correlation of -0.13, they often move in opposite directions. EPEM charges 0.84%/yr vs 1.09%/yr for BAMU.

Performance

EPEM vs. BAMU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Harbor Emerging Markets Equity ETF (EPEM) and Brookstone Ultra-Short Bond ETF (BAMU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EPEM achieves a 28.50% return, which is significantly higher than BAMU's 1.08% return.

EPEM

• 1D: -0.80%
• 1M: 4.68%
• YTD: 28.50%
• 6M: 31.04%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BAMU

• 1D: 0.02%
• 1M: 0.22%
• YTD: 1.08%
• 6M: 1.31%
• 1Y: 2.95%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EPEM vs. BAMU - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
EPEM Harbor Emerging Markets Equity ETF	28.50%	20.76%
BAMU Brookstone Ultra-Short Bond ETF	1.08%	1.85%

Correlation

The correlation between EPEM and BAMU is -0.13, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 6, 2025	-0.13

EPEM vs. BAMU - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	EPEM	BAMU
Technology	39.4%	-
Financial Services	22.7%	98.8%
Consumer Cyclical	8.5%	-
Consumer Defensive	7.0%	-
Basic Materials	6.5%	-
Communication Services	6.0%	-
Energy	3.6%	-
Industrials	3.1%	-
Healthcare	2.1%	-
Real Estate	1.3%	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

EPEM vs. BAMU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BAMU

BAMU Risk / Return Rank: 98
BAMU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 98
BAMU Sortino Ratio Rank: 98
BAMU Omega Ratio Rank: 98
BAMU Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
BAMU Martin Ratio Rank: 99

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EPEM vs. BAMU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Harbor Emerging Markets Equity ETF (EPEM) and Brookstone Ultra-Short Bond ETF (BAMU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	EPEM	BAMU	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	5.01	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	2.88	4.15	-1.26

Drawdowns

EPEM vs. BAMU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EPEM drawdown since its inception was -13.27%, which is greater than BAMU's maximum drawdown of -0.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EPEM and BAMU.

Drawdown Indicators

	EPEM	BAMU	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-13.27%	-0.36%	-12.91%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-0.12%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.48%	0.00%	-2.48%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.96%	-0.02%	-1.94%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	0.03%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	EPEM	BAMU	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	0.07%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	0.43%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	19.36%	0.59%	+18.77%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.36%	0.87%	+18.49%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.36%	0.87%	+18.49%

EPEM vs. BAMU - Expense Ratio Comparison

EPEM has a 0.84% expense ratio, which is lower than BAMU's 1.09% expense ratio.

Dividends

EPEM vs. BAMU - Dividend Comparison

EPEM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.85%, less than BAMU's 3.06% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
BAMU Brookstone Ultra-Short Bond ETF	3.06%	3.20%	3.97%	0.84%
EPEM Harbor Emerging Markets Equity ETF	2.85%	3.66%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both EPEM and BAMU in my portfolio?

EPEM and BAMU have a correlation of -0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, EPEM or BAMU?

On fees, EPEM is cheaper at 0.84% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, EPEM or BAMU?

EPEM is cheaper with a 0.84% expense ratio, compared with 1.09% for BAMU.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, EPEM or BAMU?

BAMU has the higher dividend yield at 3.06%, compared with 2.85% for EPEM.

What is the main difference between EPEM and BAMU?

EPEM is categorized as Emerging Markets Diversified, while BAMU is Ultrashort Bond. They also come from different issuers: Harbor and Brookstone. Their fees differ too: 0.84% for EPEM and 1.09% for BAMU.