EPD vs. MFC
EPD (Enterprise Products Partners L.P.) and MFC (Manulife Financial Corporation) are both stocks. EPD operates in Oil & Gas Midstream (Energy), while MFC operates in Insurance - Life (Financial Services). Over the past 10 years, EPD returned 10.61%/yr vs 16.48%/yr for MFC. At a 0.30 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
EPD vs. MFC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EPD achieves a 19.79% return, which is significantly higher than MFC's 13.26% return. Over the past 10 years, EPD has underperformed MFC with an annualized return of 10.61%, while MFC has yielded a comparatively higher 16.48% annualized return.
EPD
- 1D
- -0.08%
- 1M
- -5.05%
- YTD
- 19.79%
- 6M
- 19.53%
- 1Y
- 24.08%
- 3Y*
- 20.73%
- 5Y*
- 15.96%
- 10Y*
- 10.61%
MFC
- 1D
- 1.31%
- 1M
- 8.29%
- YTD
- 13.26%
- 6M
- 15.81%
- 1Y
- 34.36%
- 3Y*
- 33.59%
- 5Y*
- 20.37%
- 10Y*
- 16.48%
EPD vs. MFC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EPD Enterprise Products Partners L.P. | 19.79% | 9.45% | 28.00% | 17.71% | 18.32% | 21.40% | -23.61% | 21.88% | -1.32% | 4.24% |
MFC Manulife Financial Corporation | 13.26% | 22.95% | 45.75% | 31.13% | -1.18% | 12.17% | -7.18% | 49.19% | -29.89% | 22.17% |
Correlation
The correlation between EPD and MFC is 0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.01 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.21 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.36 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.39 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 24, 1999 | 0.30 |
Over the past year, the correlation between EPD and MFC has dropped to 0.01 - well below their long-term average of 0.30, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Fundamentals
EPD:
$81.47B
MFC:
$48.69B
EPD:
$2.69
MFC:
CA$4.06
EPD:
13.83
MFC:
13.89
EPD:
2.22
MFC:
4.87
EPD:
1.58
MFC:
1.12
EPD:
$51.57B
MFC:
CA$79.35B
EPD:
$7.31B
MFC:
CA$26.46B
EPD:
$10.11B
MFC:
CA$8.26B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EPD vs. MFC — Risk / Return Rank
EPD
MFC
EPD vs. MFC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Enterprise Products Partners L.P. (EPD) and Manulife Financial Corporation (MFC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| EPD | MFC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.07 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.30 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | 1.26 | +0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.24 | 2.44 | +0.80 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.50 | 6.98 | +2.52 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
EPD vs. MFC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EPD drawdown since its inception was -58.78%, smaller than the maximum MFC drawdown of -83.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EPD and MFC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EPD | MFC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -58.78% | -83.61% | +24.83% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.56% | -12.49% | +4.93% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.40% | -16.75% | +1.35% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.06% | -26.99% | +8.93% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -58.04% | -57.44% | -0.60% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.41% | 0.00% | -6.41% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.22% | -29.39% | +19.17% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.58% | 4.43% | -1.85% |
Volatility
EPD vs. MFC - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Enterprise Products Partners L.P. (EPD) is 6.00%, while Manulife Financial Corporation (MFC) has a volatility of 8.02%. This indicates that EPD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MFC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EPD | MFC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.00% | 8.02% | -2.02% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.27% | 15.87% | -2.60% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.90% | 20.74% | -4.84% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.23% | 24.12% | -6.89% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.14% | 28.39% | -4.25% |
Dividends
EPD vs. MFC - Dividend Comparison
EPD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.88%, more than MFC's 3.31% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EPD Enterprise Products Partners L.P. | 5.88% | 6.74% | 6.63% | 7.51% | 7.79% | 8.20% | 9.09% | 6.23% | 6.97% | 6.29% | 5.88% | 5.90% |
MFC Manulife Financial Corporation | 3.31% | 3.45% | 4.16% | 4.86% | 5.71% | 4.91% | 4.70% | 3.71% | 4.08% | 3.93% | 4.15% | 5.38% |
Financials
EPD vs. MFC - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Enterprise Products Partners L.P. and Manulife Financial Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
EPD vs. MFC - Profitability Comparison
EPD - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Enterprise Products Partners L.P. reported a gross profit of 1.88B and revenue of 14.39B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 13.1%.
MFC - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Manulife Financial Corporation reported a gross profit of 12.31B and revenue of 12.31B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 100.0%.
EPD - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Enterprise Products Partners L.P. reported an operating income of 1.82B and revenue of 14.39B, resulting in an operating margin of 12.6%.
MFC - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Manulife Financial Corporation reported an operating income of 1.47B and revenue of 12.31B, resulting in an operating margin of 11.9%.
EPD - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Enterprise Products Partners L.P. reported a net income of 1.48B and revenue of 14.39B, resulting in a net margin of 10.3%.
MFC - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Manulife Financial Corporation reported a net income of 1.20B and revenue of 12.31B, resulting in a net margin of 9.7%.
Frequently Asked Questions
EPD and MFC have a correlation of 0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MFC has higher volatility (8.02%) compared to EPD (6.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EPD dropped -58.78% vs MFC's -83.61%.
EPD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.54 vs 1.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EPD and MFC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer