EPAI vs. ASMH

Last updated Jul 17, 2026

EPAI (Harbor AI Inflection Strategy ETF) and ASMH (ASML Holding NV ADR Hedged ETF) are both Technology Equities funds. EPAI is actively managed, while ASMH is passively managed. Their correlation of 0.81 suggests significant overlap in exposure. EPAI charges 0.88%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for ASMH.

Performance

EPAI vs. ASMH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Harbor AI Inflection Strategy ETF (EPAI) and ASML Holding NV ADR Hedged ETF (ASMH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EPAI achieves a 35.72% return, which is significantly lower than ASMH's 71.44% return.

EPAI

• 1D: -2.76%
• 1M: -7.50%
• 6M: 23.11%
• YTD: 35.72%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

ASMH

• 1D: -2.11%
• 1M: 0.25%
• 6M: 36.58%
• YTD: 71.44%
• 1Y: 143.52%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EPAI vs. ASMH - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
EPAI Harbor AI Inflection Strategy ETF	35.72%	-0.33%
ASMH ASML Holding NV ADR Hedged ETF	71.44%	5.30%

Correlation

The correlation between EPAI and ASMH is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 18, 2025	0.81

Return for Risk

EPAI vs. ASMH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EPAI

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

ASMH

ASMH Risk / Return Rank: 95
ASMH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 97
ASMH Sortino Ratio Rank: 93
ASMH Omega Ratio Rank: 89
ASMH Calmar Ratio Rank: 98
ASMH Martin Ratio Rank: 96

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EPAI vs. ASMH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Harbor AI Inflection Strategy ETF (EPAI) and ASML Holding NV ADR Hedged ETF (ASMH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	EPAI	ASMH	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	3.37	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	3.73	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.45	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	9.79	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	28.17	—

Drawdowns

EPAI vs. ASMH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EPAI drawdown since its inception was -14.76%, smaller than the maximum ASMH drawdown of -15.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EPAI and ASMH.

Drawdown Indicators

	EPAI	ASMH	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-14.76%	-15.89%	+1.13%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-14.75%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-14.76%	-10.51%	-4.25%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.30%	-4.41%	+1.11%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	5.17%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	EPAI	ASMH	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	18.11%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	34.14%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	35.83%	43.78%	-7.95%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	35.83%	41.26%	-5.43%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	35.83%	41.26%	-5.43%

EPAI vs. ASMH - Expense Ratio Comparison

EPAI has a 0.88% expense ratio, which is higher than ASMH's 0.19% expense ratio.

Dividends

EPAI vs. ASMH - Dividend Comparison

EPAI has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ASMH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.63%.

Position	TTM	2025
ASMH ASML Holding NV ADR Hedged ETF	1.63%	0.19%
EPAI Harbor AI Inflection Strategy ETF	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both EPAI and ASMH in my portfolio?

EPAI and ASMH have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, EPAI or ASMH?

On fees, ASMH is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, EPAI or ASMH?

ASMH is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.88% for EPAI.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, EPAI or ASMH?

ASMH has the higher dividend yield at 1.63%, compared with 0.00% for EPAI.

What is the main difference between EPAI and ASMH?

They also come from different issuers: Harbor and Precidian Funds. Their fees differ too: 0.88% for EPAI and 0.19% for ASMH.