EPAI vs. ARMH

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

EPAI (Harbor AI Inflection Strategy ETF) and ARMH (Arm Holdings PLC ADRhedged ETF) are both Technology Equities funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.46 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. EPAI charges 0.88%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for ARMH.

Performance

EPAI vs. ARMH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Harbor AI Inflection Strategy ETF (EPAI) and Arm Holdings PLC ADRhedged ETF (ARMH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

EPAI

• 1D: -4.72%
• 1M: 7.32%
• YTD: 48.89%
• 6M: 46.39%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

ARMH

• 1D: -9.46%
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EPAI vs. ARMH - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
EPAI Harbor AI Inflection Strategy ETF	5.05%
ARMH Arm Holdings PLC ADRhedged ETF	19.49%

Correlation

The correlation between EPAI and ARMH is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 28, 2026	0.46

Return for Risk

EPAI vs. ARMH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Harbor AI Inflection Strategy ETF (EPAI) and Arm Holdings PLC ADRhedged ETF (ARMH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Drawdowns

EPAI vs. ARMH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EPAI drawdown since its inception was -12.31%, smaller than the maximum ARMH drawdown of -24.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EPAI and ARMH.

Drawdown Indicators

	EPAI	ARMH	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-12.31%	-24.85%	+12.54%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.72%	-16.34%	+11.62%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.65%	-7.72%	+5.07%

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	EPAI	ARMH	Difference
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	33.26%	122.02%	-88.76%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	33.26%	122.02%	-88.76%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	33.26%	122.02%	-88.76%

EPAI vs. ARMH - Expense Ratio Comparison

EPAI has a 0.88% expense ratio, which is higher than ARMH's 0.19% expense ratio.

Dividends

EPAI vs. ARMH - Dividend Comparison

Neither EPAI nor ARMH has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both EPAI and ARMH in my portfolio?

EPAI and ARMH have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, EPAI or ARMH?

On fees, ARMH is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, EPAI or ARMH?

ARMH is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.88% for EPAI.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, EPAI or ARMH?

EPAI and ARMH have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between EPAI and ARMH?

They also come from different issuers: Harbor and Precidian. Their fees differ too: 0.88% for EPAI and 0.19% for ARMH.