EOD vs. QQQI

Last updated Jul 15, 2026

EOD (Wells Fargo Advantage Funds - Allspring Global Dividend Opportunity Fund) and QQQI (NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF) are both funds - EOD is a Dividend fund managed by Wells Fargo, while QQQI is a Nasdaq-100 fund actively managed by Neos. Over the past year, EOD returned 31.14% vs 22.96% for QQQI. A 0.65 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. EOD charges 0.02%/yr vs 0.68%/yr for QQQI.

Performance

EOD vs. QQQI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Wells Fargo Advantage Funds - Allspring Global Dividend Opportunity Fund (EOD) and NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF (QQQI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EOD achieves a 18.36% return, which is significantly higher than QQQI's 11.53% return.

EOD

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 2.96%
• 6M: 15.01%
• YTD: 18.36%
• 1Y: 31.14%
• 3Y*: 25.84%
• 5Y*: 12.73%
• 10Y*: 11.73%

QQQI

• 1D: 1.03%
• 1M: 0.87%
• 6M: 9.92%
• YTD: 11.53%
• 1Y: 22.96%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EOD vs. QQQI - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
EOD Wells Fargo Advantage Funds - Allspring Global Dividend Opportunity Fund	18.36%	28.76%	23.55%
QQQI NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF	11.53%	18.62%	19.44%

Correlation

The correlation between EOD and QQQI is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.66
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 30, 2024	0.65

The correlation between EOD and QQQI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.65 to 0.66 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

EOD vs. QQQI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EOD

EOD Risk / Return Rank: 84
EOD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 80
EOD Sortino Ratio Rank: 80
EOD Omega Ratio Rank: 80
EOD Calmar Ratio Rank: 86
EOD Martin Ratio Rank: 95

QQQI

QQQI Risk / Return Rank: 58
QQQI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
QQQI Sortino Ratio Rank: 51
QQQI Omega Ratio Rank: 56
QQQI Calmar Ratio Rank: 60
QQQI Martin Ratio Rank: 69

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EOD vs. QQQI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Wells Fargo Advantage Funds - Allspring Global Dividend Opportunity Fund (EOD) and NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF (QQQI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	EOD	QQQI	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.06	1.49	+0.56
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.97	2.03	+0.94
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.39	1.28	+0.12
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.25	2.40	+0.85
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	16.68	9.90	+6.78

EOD vs. QQQI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EOD Sharpe Ratio is 2.06, which is higher than the QQQI Sharpe Ratio of 1.49. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EOD and QQQI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

EOD vs. QQQI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EOD drawdown since its inception was -57.02%, which is greater than QQQI's maximum drawdown of -20.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EOD and QQQI.

Drawdown Indicators

	EOD	QQQI	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-57.02%	-20.00%	-37.02%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.63%	-9.61%	-0.02%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-15.00%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-25.61%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-47.08%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-1.84%	+1.84%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-13.15%	-2.21%	-10.94%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.87%	2.32%	-0.45%

Volatility

EOD vs. QQQI - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Wells Fargo Advantage Funds - Allspring Global Dividend Opportunity Fund (EOD) is 3.69%, while NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF (QQQI) has a volatility of 6.94%. This indicates that EOD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QQQI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	EOD	QQQI	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.69%	6.94%	-3.25%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.78%	12.78%	0.00%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.23%	15.44%	-0.21%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.59%	17.60%	-0.01%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.95%	17.60%	+1.35%

EOD vs. QQQI - Expense Ratio Comparison

EOD has a 0.02% expense ratio, which is lower than QQQI's 0.68% expense ratio.

Dividends

EOD vs. QQQI - Dividend Comparison

EOD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.13%, less than QQQI's 13.62% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
EOD Wells Fargo Advantage Funds - Allspring Global Dividend Opportunity Fund	8.13%	8.73%	9.16%	9.98%	11.80%	8.76%	11.41%	10.36%	13.84%	10.56%	9.91%	12.16%
QQQI NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF	13.62%	13.82%	12.85%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both EOD and QQQI in my portfolio?

EOD and QQQI have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, EOD or QQQI?

QQQI has higher volatility (6.94%) compared to EOD (3.69%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EOD dropped -57.02% vs QQQI's -20.00%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

EOD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.06 vs 1.49), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.