ENZL vs. THD
ENZL (iShares MSCI New Zealand ETF) and THD (iShares MSCI Thailand ETF) are both Asia Pacific Equities funds from iShares - ENZL tracks the MSCI New Zealand Investable Market Index while THD tracks the MSCI Thailand Investable Market Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, ENZL returned 3.34%/yr vs 3.47%/yr for THD. At a 0.44 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. ENZL charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.59%/yr for THD.
Performance
ENZL vs. THD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ENZL achieves a -0.60% return, which is significantly lower than THD's 24.17% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with ENZL having a 3.34% annualized return and THD not far ahead at 3.47%.
ENZL
- 1D
- -1.64%
- 1M
- 0.88%
- YTD
- -0.60%
- 6M
- -1.29%
- 1Y
- 3.15%
- 3Y*
- -0.29%
- 5Y*
- -4.24%
- 10Y*
- 3.34%
THD
- 1D
- -0.75%
- 1M
- 5.54%
- YTD
- 24.17%
- 6M
- 25.06%
- 1Y
- 42.49%
- 3Y*
- 5.77%
- 5Y*
- 0.86%
- 10Y*
- 3.47%
ENZL vs. THD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ENZL iShares MSCI New Zealand ETF | -0.60% | 2.47% | -4.86% | 2.95% | -16.18% | -11.39% | 20.04% | 30.09% | 0.35% | 24.04% |
THD iShares MSCI Thailand ETF | 24.17% | 2.36% | -2.21% | -12.63% | 1.22% | 1.87% | -9.89% | 8.32% | -8.25% | 31.45% |
Correlation
The correlation between ENZL and THD is 0.41, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.41 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.39 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.42 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.41 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 3, 2010 | 0.44 |
ENZL vs. THD - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
ENZL
THD
Utilities
Healthcare
Industrials
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Communication Services
Energy
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
Technology
Utilities
ENZL
THD
Healthcare
ENZL
THD
Industrials
ENZL
THD
Real Estate
ENZL
THD
Basic Materials
ENZL
THD
Communication Services
ENZL
THD
Energy
ENZL
THD
Financial Services
ENZL
THD
Consumer Cyclical
ENZL
THD
Consumer Defensive
ENZL
THD
Technology
ENZL
THD
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ENZL vs. THD — Risk / Return Rank
ENZL
THD
ENZL vs. THD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI New Zealand ETF (ENZL) and iShares MSCI Thailand ETF (THD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ENZL | THD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.68 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.20 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.05 | 1.32 | -0.27 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.25 | 3.25 | -3.01 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.70 | 9.35 | -8.66 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ENZL | THD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.20 | 1.88 | -1.68 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.23 | 0.04 | -0.27 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.16 | 0.16 | 0.00 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.37 | 0.18 | +0.19 |
Drawdowns
ENZL vs. THD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ENZL drawdown since its inception was -42.44%, smaller than the maximum THD drawdown of -64.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ENZL and THD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ENZL | THD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -42.44% | -64.22% | +21.78% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.90% | -13.12% | +0.22% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.67% | -34.11% | +13.44% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -36.86% | -40.24% | +3.38% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -42.44% | -49.32% | +6.88% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -29.65% | -8.82% | -20.83% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.78% | -18.28% | +5.50% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.54% | 4.58% | -0.04% |
Volatility
ENZL vs. THD - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares MSCI New Zealand ETF (ENZL) is 6.01%, while iShares MSCI Thailand ETF (THD) has a volatility of 6.41%. This indicates that ENZL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than THD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ENZL | THD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.01% | 6.41% | -0.40% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.02% | 18.28% | -5.26% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.97% | 22.67% | -6.70% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.59% | 19.79% | -1.20% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.44% | 21.58% | -1.14% |
ENZL vs. THD - Expense Ratio Comparison
ENZL has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than THD's 0.59% expense ratio.
Dividends
ENZL vs. THD - Dividend Comparison
ENZL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.25%, less than THD's 2.71% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ENZL iShares MSCI New Zealand ETF | 2.25% | 2.23% | 2.13% | 3.00% | 1.62% | 2.46% | 1.66% | 3.35% | 3.60% | 3.69% | 4.79% | 4.29% |
THD iShares MSCI Thailand ETF | 2.71% | 3.36% | 3.15% | 2.92% | 2.41% | 3.16% | 2.31% | 2.42% | 2.57% | 2.16% | 2.61% | 3.58% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ENZL and THD have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
THD has higher volatility (6.41%) compared to ENZL (6.01%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ENZL dropped -42.44% vs THD's -64.22%.
On 10-year performance, THD leads with 3.47% vs 3.34% for ENZL. On fees, ENZL is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, ENZL has been the lower-risk option at 6.01%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, THD has performed better with a 3.47% return vs 3.34%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
ENZL is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for THD.
THD has the higher dividend yield at 2.71%, compared with 2.25% for ENZL.
ENZL tracks MSCI New Zealand Investable Market Index, while THD tracks MSCI Thailand Investable Market Index. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for ENZL and 0.59% for THD.
THD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.88 vs 0.20), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ENZL and THD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer