ENZL vs. EMMF
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares MSCI New Zealand ETF (ENZL) and WisdomTree Emerging Markets Multifactor Fund (EMMF).
ENZL and EMMF are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. ENZL is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI New Zealand Investable Market Index. It was launched on Sep 1, 2010. EMMF is an actively managed fund by WisdomTree. It was launched on Aug 10, 2018.
Performance
ENZL vs. EMMF - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
ENZL vs. EMMF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ENZL iShares MSCI New Zealand ETF | -5.80% | 2.47% | -4.86% | 2.95% | -16.18% | -11.39% | 20.04% | 30.09% | -0.11% |
EMMF WisdomTree Emerging Markets Multifactor Fund | 5.23% | 21.22% | 9.45% | 20.59% | -13.47% | 5.97% | 9.25% | 2.30% | -6.64% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ENZL achieves a -5.80% return, which is significantly lower than EMMF's 5.23% return.
ENZL
- 1D
- 2.02%
- 1M
- -10.18%
- YTD
- -5.80%
- 6M
- -5.97%
- 1Y
- 3.63%
- 3Y*
- -2.77%
- 5Y*
- -5.18%
- 10Y*
- 3.33%
EMMF
- 1D
- 3.29%
- 1M
- -7.68%
- YTD
- 5.23%
- 6M
- 9.36%
- 1Y
- 27.88%
- 3Y*
- 17.64%
- 5Y*
- 7.45%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
ENZL vs. EMMF - Expense Ratio Comparison
ENZL has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than EMMF's 0.48% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
ENZL vs. EMMF — Risk / Return Rank
ENZL
EMMF
ENZL vs. EMMF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI New Zealand ETF (ENZL) and WisdomTree Emerging Markets Multifactor Fund (EMMF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ENZL | EMMF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.21 | 1.66 | -1.45 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.41 | 2.25 | -1.84 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.05 | 1.34 | -0.28 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.29 | 2.58 | -2.30 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.07 | 10.52 | -9.45 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ENZL | EMMF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.21 | 1.66 | -1.45 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.28 | 0.53 | -0.82 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.16 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.35 | 0.39 | -0.04 |
Correlation
The correlation between ENZL and EMMF is 0.52, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
ENZL vs. EMMF - Dividend Comparison
ENZL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.37%, more than EMMF's 2.25% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ENZL iShares MSCI New Zealand ETF | 2.37% | 2.23% | 2.13% | 3.00% | 1.62% | 2.46% | 1.66% | 3.35% | 3.60% | 3.69% | 4.79% | 4.29% |
EMMF WisdomTree Emerging Markets Multifactor Fund | 2.25% | 2.45% | 1.30% | 1.62% | 3.48% | 2.64% | 1.93% | 2.93% | 0.66% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
ENZL vs. EMMF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ENZL drawdown since its inception was -42.44%, which is greater than EMMF's maximum drawdown of -32.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ENZL and EMMF.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| ENZL | EMMF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -42.44% | -32.57% | -9.87% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.90% | -10.62% | -2.28% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -37.18% | -25.20% | -11.98% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -42.44% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -33.33% | -7.68% | -25.65% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.58% | -7.58% | -5.00% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.46% | 2.61% | +0.85% |
Volatility
ENZL vs. EMMF - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares MSCI New Zealand ETF (ENZL) is 7.12%, while WisdomTree Emerging Markets Multifactor Fund (EMMF) has a volatility of 9.11%. This indicates that ENZL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EMMF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| ENZL | EMMF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.12% | 9.11% | -1.99% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.45% | 12.48% | -1.03% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.39% | 16.91% | +0.48% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.45% | 14.01% | +4.44% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.39% | 16.45% | +3.94% |