EMMF vs. IVV
EMMF (WisdomTree Emerging Markets Multifactor Fund) and IVV (iShares Core S&P 500 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - EMMF is a Asia Pacific Equities fund actively managed by WisdomTree, while IVV is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index. EMMF is actively managed, while IVV is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, EMMF returned 11.18%/yr vs 14.26%/yr for IVV. A 0.66 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. EMMF charges 0.48%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for IVV.
Performance
EMMF vs. IVV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EMMF achieves a 29.25% return, which is significantly higher than IVV's 11.70% return.
EMMF
- 1D
- -0.25%
- 1M
- 12.42%
- YTD
- 29.25%
- 6M
- 30.61%
- 1Y
- 50.65%
- 3Y*
- 24.40%
- 5Y*
- 11.18%
- 10Y*
- —
IVV
- 1D
- 0.14%
- 1M
- 5.39%
- YTD
- 11.70%
- 6M
- 12.12%
- 1Y
- 29.71%
- 3Y*
- 22.74%
- 5Y*
- 14.26%
- 10Y*
- 15.62%
EMMF vs. IVV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EMMF WisdomTree Emerging Markets Multifactor Fund | 29.25% | 21.22% | 9.45% | 20.59% | -13.47% | 5.97% | 9.25% | 2.30% | -6.64% |
IVV iShares Core S&P 500 ETF | 11.70% | 17.85% | 24.93% | 26.31% | -18.16% | 28.76% | 18.40% | 31.07% | -10.75% |
Correlation
The correlation between EMMF and IVV is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.73 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.68 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.66 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 13, 2018 | 0.66 |
The correlation between EMMF and IVV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.66 to 0.73 - a consistent structural relationship.
EMMF vs. IVV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
EMMF
IVV
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
Financial Services
Communication Services
Consumer Defensive
Industrials
Energy
Utilities
Basic Materials
Healthcare
Real Estate
-
Technology
EMMF
IVV
Consumer Cyclical
EMMF
IVV
Financial Services
EMMF
IVV
Communication Services
EMMF
IVV
Consumer Defensive
EMMF
IVV
Industrials
EMMF
IVV
Energy
EMMF
IVV
Utilities
EMMF
IVV
Basic Materials
EMMF
IVV
Healthcare
EMMF
IVV
Real Estate
EMMF
-
IVV
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EMMF vs. IVV — Risk / Return Rank
EMMF
IVV
EMMF vs. IVV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Emerging Markets Multifactor Fund (EMMF) and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EMMF | IVV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 3.08 | 2.54 | +0.54 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 4.02 | 3.44 | +0.58 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.59 | 1.46 | +0.12 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.79 | 3.43 | +1.37 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 19.83 | 15.97 | +3.87 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EMMF | IVV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.08 | 2.54 | +0.54 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.78 | 0.85 | -0.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.87 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.55 | 0.46 | +0.10 |
Drawdowns
EMMF vs. IVV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EMMF drawdown since its inception was -32.57%, smaller than the maximum IVV drawdown of -55.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EMMF and IVV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EMMF | IVV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -32.57% | -55.25% | +22.68% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.62% | -8.89% | -1.73% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.02% | -18.75% | +2.73% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.99% | -24.53% | -0.46% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -33.90% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.25% | 0.00% | -0.25% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.45% | -10.78% | +3.33% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.57% | 1.91% | +0.66% |
Volatility
EMMF vs. IVV - Volatility Comparison
WisdomTree Emerging Markets Multifactor Fund (EMMF) has a higher volatility of 7.08% compared to iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) at 2.75%. This indicates that EMMF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IVV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EMMF | IVV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.08% | 2.75% | +4.33% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.42% | 8.87% | +5.55% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.53% | 11.78% | +4.75% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.38% | 16.88% | -2.50% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.62% | 18.05% | -1.43% |
EMMF vs. IVV - Expense Ratio Comparison
EMMF has a 0.48% expense ratio, which is higher than IVV's 0.03% expense ratio.
Dividends
EMMF vs. IVV - Dividend Comparison
EMMF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.83%, more than IVV's 1.06% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EMMF WisdomTree Emerging Markets Multifactor Fund | 1.83% | 2.45% | 1.30% | 1.62% | 3.48% | 2.64% | 1.93% | 2.93% | 0.66% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
IVV iShares Core S&P 500 ETF | 1.06% | 1.17% | 1.30% | 1.44% | 1.66% | 1.20% | 1.57% | 1.85% | 2.21% | 1.75% | 2.01% | 2.27% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EMMF and IVV have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
EMMF has higher volatility (7.08%) compared to IVV (2.75%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EMMF dropped -32.57% vs IVV's -55.25%.
On 5-year performance, IVV leads with 14.26% vs 11.18% for EMMF. On fees, IVV is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, IVV has been the lower-risk option at 2.75%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, IVV has performed better with a 14.26% return vs 11.18%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IVV is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.48% for EMMF.
EMMF has the higher dividend yield at 1.83%, compared with 1.06% for IVV.
EMMF is categorized as Asia Pacific Equities, while IVV is S&P 500. They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.48% for EMMF and 0.03% for IVV.
EMMF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.08 vs 2.54), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EMMF and IVV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer