PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EMMF vs. IVV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EMMF vs. IVV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WisdomTree Emerging Markets Multifactor Fund (EMMF) and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EMMF achieves a 29.25% return, which is significantly higher than IVV's 11.70% return.


EMMF

1D
-0.25%
1M
12.42%
YTD
29.25%
6M
30.61%
1Y
50.65%
3Y*
24.40%
5Y*
11.18%
10Y*

IVV

1D
0.14%
1M
5.39%
YTD
11.70%
6M
12.12%
1Y
29.71%
3Y*
22.74%
5Y*
14.26%
10Y*
15.62%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EMMF vs. IVV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
EMMF
WisdomTree Emerging Markets Multifactor Fund
29.25%21.22%9.45%20.59%-13.47%5.97%9.25%2.30%-6.64%
IVV
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
11.70%17.85%24.93%26.31%-18.16%28.76%18.40%31.07%-10.75%

Correlation

The correlation between EMMF and IVV is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.73

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.68

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.66

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 13, 2018

0.66

The correlation between EMMF and IVV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.66 to 0.73 - a consistent structural relationship.

EMMF vs. IVV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
EMMF
IVV

Technology

32.9%
35.6%

Consumer Cyclical

14.0%
10.1%

Financial Services

8.2%
11.8%

Communication Services

6.6%
11.2%

Consumer Defensive

4.4%
4.9%

Industrials

3.8%
8.3%

Energy

2.1%
3.5%

Utilities

2.0%
2.4%

Basic Materials

1.9%
1.8%

Healthcare

0.3%
8.5%

Real Estate

-

1.9%

Technology

EMMF
32.9%
IVV
35.6%

Consumer Cyclical

EMMF
14.0%
IVV
10.1%

Financial Services

EMMF
8.2%
IVV
11.8%

Communication Services

EMMF
6.6%
IVV
11.2%

Consumer Defensive

EMMF
4.4%
IVV
4.9%

Industrials

EMMF
3.8%
IVV
8.3%

Energy

EMMF
2.1%
IVV
3.5%

Utilities

EMMF
2.0%
IVV
2.4%

Basic Materials

EMMF
1.9%
IVV
1.8%

Healthcare

EMMF
0.3%
IVV
8.5%

Real Estate

EMMF

-

IVV
1.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EMMF vs. IVV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EMMF
EMMF Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
EMMF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EMMF Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
EMMF Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
EMMF Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
EMMF Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank

IVV
IVV Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
IVV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IVV Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
IVV Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
IVV Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
IVV Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EMMF vs. IVV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Emerging Markets Multifactor Fund (EMMF) and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EMMFIVVDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

3.08

2.54

+0.54

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

4.02

3.44

+0.58

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.59

1.46

+0.12

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

4.79

3.43

+1.37

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

19.83

15.97

+3.87

EMMF vs. IVV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EMMF Sharpe Ratio is 3.08, which is comparable to the IVV Sharpe Ratio of 2.54. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EMMF and IVV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EMMFIVVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.08

2.54

+0.54

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.78

0.85

-0.07

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.87

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.55

0.46

+0.10

Drawdowns

EMMF vs. IVV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EMMF drawdown since its inception was -32.57%, smaller than the maximum IVV drawdown of -55.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EMMF and IVV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EMMFIVVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-32.57%

-55.25%

+22.68%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.62%

-8.89%

-1.73%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.02%

-18.75%

+2.73%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.99%

-24.53%

-0.46%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.90%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.25%

0.00%

-0.25%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.45%

-10.78%

+3.33%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.57%

1.91%

+0.66%

Volatility

EMMF vs. IVV - Volatility Comparison

WisdomTree Emerging Markets Multifactor Fund (EMMF) has a higher volatility of 7.08% compared to iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) at 2.75%. This indicates that EMMF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IVV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EMMFIVVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.08%

2.75%

+4.33%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.42%

8.87%

+5.55%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.53%

11.78%

+4.75%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.38%

16.88%

-2.50%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.62%

18.05%

-1.43%

EMMF vs. IVV - Expense Ratio Comparison

EMMF has a 0.48% expense ratio, which is higher than IVV's 0.03% expense ratio.


Dividends

EMMF vs. IVV - Dividend Comparison

EMMF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.83%, more than IVV's 1.06% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EMMF
WisdomTree Emerging Markets Multifactor Fund
1.83%2.45%1.30%1.62%3.48%2.64%1.93%2.93%0.66%0.00%0.00%0.00%
IVV
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
1.06%1.17%1.30%1.44%1.66%1.20%1.57%1.85%2.21%1.75%2.01%2.27%

Frequently Asked Questions


EMMF and IVV have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EMMF has higher volatility (7.08%) compared to IVV (2.75%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EMMF dropped -32.57% vs IVV's -55.25%.

On 5-year performance, IVV leads with 14.26% vs 11.18% for EMMF. On fees, IVV is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, IVV has been the lower-risk option at 2.75%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, IVV has performed better with a 14.26% return vs 11.18%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IVV is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.48% for EMMF.

EMMF has the higher dividend yield at 1.83%, compared with 1.06% for IVV.

EMMF is categorized as Asia Pacific Equities, while IVV is S&P 500. They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.48% for EMMF and 0.03% for IVV.

EMMF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.08 vs 2.54), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EMMF and IVV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer