ENTR.DE vs. XCMC.DE
ENTR.DE (L&G New Energy Commodities UCITS ETF USD Accumulating) and XCMC.DE (Xtrackers Bloomberg Commodity Swap UCITS ETF 1C) are both Commodities funds - ENTR.DE tracks the Solactive Energy Transition Commodity while XCMC.DE tracks the Bloomberg Commodity 3 Month Forward. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, ENTR.DE returned 37.69% vs 29.14% for XCMC.DE. A 0.61 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ENTR.DE charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for XCMC.DE.
Performance
ENTR.DE vs. XCMC.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ENTR.DE achieves a 12.78% return, which is significantly lower than XCMC.DE's 28.51% return.
ENTR.DE
- 1D
- -0.84%
- 1M
- 1.00%
- YTD
- 12.78%
- 6M
- 23.00%
- 1Y
- 37.69%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XCMC.DE
- 1D
- -1.20%
- 1M
- -1.31%
- YTD
- 28.51%
- 6M
- 19.96%
- 1Y
- 29.14%
- 3Y*
- 11.29%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ENTR.DE vs. XCMC.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
ENTR.DE L&G New Energy Commodities UCITS ETF USD Accumulating | 12.78% | 17.08% | -0.06% |
XCMC.DE Xtrackers Bloomberg Commodity Swap UCITS ETF 1C | 28.51% | -2.66% | 1.55% |
Correlation
The correlation between ENTR.DE and XCMC.DE is 0.54, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.54 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 18, 2024 | 0.61 |
The correlation between ENTR.DE and XCMC.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.54 to 0.61 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ENTR.DE vs. XCMC.DE — Risk / Return Rank
ENTR.DE
XCMC.DE
ENTR.DE vs. XCMC.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for L&G New Energy Commodities UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (ENTR.DE) and Xtrackers Bloomberg Commodity Swap UCITS ETF 1C (XCMC.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ENTR.DE | XCMC.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.61 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.83 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.41 | 1.32 | +0.09 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.86 | 3.72 | +0.14 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.56 | 8.44 | +5.12 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ENTR.DE | XCMC.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.27 | 1.66 | +0.61 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.92 | 0.44 | +0.48 |
Drawdowns
ENTR.DE vs. XCMC.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ENTR.DE drawdown since its inception was -14.17%, smaller than the maximum XCMC.DE drawdown of -22.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ENTR.DE and XCMC.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ENTR.DE | XCMC.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -14.17% | -22.91% | +8.74% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.72% | -7.80% | -1.92% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -14.82% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.59% | -3.42% | +0.83% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.85% | -12.68% | +6.83% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.77% | 3.45% | -0.68% |
Volatility
ENTR.DE vs. XCMC.DE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for L&G New Energy Commodities UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (ENTR.DE) is 4.62%, while Xtrackers Bloomberg Commodity Swap UCITS ETF 1C (XCMC.DE) has a volatility of 4.94%. This indicates that ENTR.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XCMC.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ENTR.DE | XCMC.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.62% | 4.94% | -0.32% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.78% | 15.31% | -1.53% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.50% | 17.48% | -0.98% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.02% | 17.33% | -2.31% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.02% | 17.33% | -2.31% |
ENTR.DE vs. XCMC.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
ENTR.DE has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than XCMC.DE's 0.19% expense ratio.
Dividends
ENTR.DE vs. XCMC.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither ENTR.DE nor XCMC.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
ENTR.DE and XCMC.DE have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XCMC.DE is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XCMC.DE is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for ENTR.DE.
ENTR.DE tracks Solactive Energy Transition Commodity, while XCMC.DE tracks Bloomberg Commodity 3 Month Forward. They also come from different issuers: Legal & General and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for ENTR.DE and 0.19% for XCMC.DE.
Find the right allocation for ENTR.DE and XCMC.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer