ENTA vs. WOLF

Last updated Jun 9, 2026

ENTA (Enanta Pharmaceuticals, Inc.) and WOLF (Wolfspeed, Inc.) are both stocks. ENTA operates in Biotechnology (Healthcare), while WOLF operates in Semiconductors (Technology). At a 0.24 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

ENTA vs. WOLF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Enanta Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (ENTA) and Wolfspeed, Inc. (WOLF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ENTA achieves a -29.80% return, which is significantly lower than WOLF's 218.32% return.

ENTA

• 1D: -1.86%
• 1M: -27.84%
• YTD: -29.80%
• 6M: -21.93%
• 1Y: 48.19%
• 3Y*: -24.76%
• 5Y*: -25.36%
• 10Y*: -7.18%

WOLF

• 1D: 0.65%
• 1M: 18.93%
• YTD: 218.32%
• 6M: 141.90%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ENTA vs. WOLF - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
ENTA Enanta Pharmaceuticals, Inc.	-29.80%	4.02%
WOLF Wolfspeed, Inc.	218.32%	-21.22%

Correlation

The correlation between ENTA and WOLF is 0.24, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 30, 2025	0.24

Fundamentals

Market Cap ENTA : $319.83M WOLF : $21.77B
EPS ENTA : -$2.67 WOLF : -$11.53
PS Ratio ENTA : 3.72 WOLF : 10.68
PB Ratio ENTA : 2.77 WOLF : 21.31
Total Revenue (TTM) ENTA : $69.21M WOLF : $712.50M
Gross Profit (TTM) ENTA : $33.44M WOLF : -$208.10M
EBITDA (TTM) ENTA : -$61.85M WOLF : -$1.26B

Return for Risk

ENTA vs. WOLF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ENTA

ENTA Risk / Return Rank: 68
ENTA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 58
ENTA Sortino Ratio Rank: 74
ENTA Omega Ratio Rank: 73
ENTA Calmar Ratio Rank: 69
ENTA Martin Ratio Rank: 66

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ENTA vs. WOLF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Enanta Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (ENTA) and Wolfspeed, Inc. (WOLF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	ENTA	WOLF	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.44	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.88	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.24	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.41	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	2.72	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	ENTA	WOLF	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.44	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.35	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	-0.12	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.05	2.34	-2.39

Drawdowns

ENTA vs. WOLF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ENTA drawdown since its inception was -96.63%, which is greater than WOLF's maximum drawdown of -58.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ENTA and WOLF.

Drawdown Indicators

	ENTA	WOLF	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-96.63%	-58.22%	-38.41%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-34.30%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-83.61%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-95.62%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-96.63%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-91.24%	-24.60%	-66.64%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-49.23%	-34.87%	-14.36%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	17.76%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	ENTA	WOLF	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	13.36%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	35.53%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	109.93%	120.69%	-10.76%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	73.36%	120.69%	-47.33%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	60.70%	120.69%	-59.99%

Dividends

ENTA vs. WOLF - Dividend Comparison

Neither ENTA nor WOLF has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ENTA and WOLF in my portfolio?

ENTA and WOLF have a correlation of 0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.