PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ENR.DE vs. LRCX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

ENR.DE vs. LRCX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Siemens Energy AG (ENR.DE) and Lam Research Corporation (LRCX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

ENR.DE is traded in EUR, while LRCX is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the LRCX values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ENR.DE achieves a 28.10% return, which is significantly lower than LRCX's 117.84% return.


ENR.DE

1D
4.48%
1M
-13.35%
YTD
28.10%
6M
29.12%
1Y
79.97%
3Y*
86.70%
5Y*
44.76%
10Y*

LRCX

1D
1.27%
1M
25.73%
YTD
117.84%
6M
132.17%
1Y
303.82%
3Y*
77.73%
5Y*
44.53%
10Y*
47.76%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ENR.DE vs. LRCX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
ENR.DE
Siemens Energy AG
28.10%138.98%319.83%-31.74%-21.43%-25.03%36.30%
LRCX
Lam Research Corporation
117.84%110.78%-0.70%82.97%-37.05%65.16%37.02%

Correlation

The correlation between ENR.DE and LRCX is 0.43, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.43

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.29

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.29

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 28, 2020

0.28

The correlation between ENR.DE and LRCX shifts across timeframes, from 0.28 (all time) to 0.43 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ENR.DE vs. LRCX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ENR.DE
ENR.DE Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
ENR.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ENR.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
ENR.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
ENR.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
ENR.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank

LRCX
LRCX Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
LRCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LRCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
LRCX Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
LRCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
LRCX Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ENR.DE vs. LRCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Siemens Energy AG (ENR.DE) and Lam Research Corporation (LRCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ENR.DELRCXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-4.29

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.59

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.64

-0.37

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.05

16.38

-13.33

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.84

55.94

-45.10

ENR.DE vs. LRCX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ENR.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.63, which is lower than the LRCX Sharpe Ratio of 5.92. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ENR.DE and LRCX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ENR.DE vs. LRCX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ENR.DE drawdown since its inception was -79.51%, which is greater than LRCX's maximum drawdown of -69.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ENR.DE and LRCX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ENR.DELRCXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-79.51%

-69.81%

-9.70%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-26.08%

-18.68%

-7.40%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-71.01%

-47.73%

-23.28%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-74.46%

-49.56%

-24.90%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-49.56%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-18.14%

0.00%

-18.14%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-28.41%

-17.78%

-10.63%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.35%

5.46%

+1.89%

Volatility

ENR.DE vs. LRCX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Siemens Energy AG (ENR.DE) is 15.19%, while Lam Research Corporation (LRCX) has a volatility of 20.69%. This indicates that ENR.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LRCX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ENR.DELRCXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

15.19%

20.69%

-5.50%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

36.28%

42.18%

-5.90%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

48.84%

51.71%

-2.87%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

52.08%

45.70%

+6.38%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

50.48%

44.62%

+5.86%

Dividends

ENR.DE vs. LRCX - Dividend Comparison

ENR.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.46%, more than LRCX's 0.28% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ENR.DE
Siemens Energy AG
0.46%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.57%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
LRCX
Lam Research Corporation
0.28%0.57%1.19%0.95%1.53%0.78%1.04%1.54%2.79%1.01%1.28%1.36%

Financials

ENR.DE vs. LRCX - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Siemens Energy AG and Lam Research Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Please note, different currencies. ENR.DE values in EUR, LRCX values in USD

Frequently Asked Questions


ENR.DE and LRCX have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ENR.DE and LRCX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer