ENPIX vs. UGPIX
ENPIX (ProFunds UltraSector Oil & Gas Fund) and UGPIX (ProFunds UltraChina) are both Leveraged Equities funds from ProFunds. Over the past 10 years, ENPIX returned 7.88%/yr vs 7.63%/yr for UGPIX. Their 0.21 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. ENPIX charges 1.51%/yr vs 1.74%/yr for UGPIX.
Performance
ENPIX vs. UGPIX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ENPIX achieves a 48.84% return, which is significantly higher than UGPIX's -32.30% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with ENPIX having a 7.88% annualized return and UGPIX not far behind at 7.63%.
ENPIX
- 1D
- 0.83%
- 1M
- 15.87%
- 6M
- 22.86%
- YTD
- 48.84%
- 1Y
- 59.39%
- 3Y*
- 14.50%
- 5Y*
- 28.19%
- 10Y*
- 7.88%
- ALL TIME*
- 5.22%
UGPIX
- 1D
- 1.36%
- 1M
- 19.83%
- 6M
- -35.18%
- YTD
- -32.30%
- 1Y
- -24.92%
- 3Y*
- -18.59%
- 5Y*
- 10.33%
- 10Y*
- 7.63%
- ALL TIME*
- -1.22%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | |
UGPIX ProFunds UltraChina | $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
ENPIX vs. UGPIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ENPIX ProFunds UltraSector Oil & Gas Fund | 48.84% | 4.99% | 2.30% | -7.46% | 92.17% | 82.32% | -53.71% | 10.35% | -30.54% | -5.59% |
UGPIX ProFunds UltraChina | -32.30% | 36.28% | -21.79% | 785.09% | -53.03% | -73.86% | 76.47% | 40.07% | -46.51% | 105.73% |
Correlation
The correlation between ENPIX and UGPIX is -0.05, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | -0.05 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.11 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.16 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.26 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 7, 2000 | 0.21 |
The correlation between ENPIX and UGPIX shifts across timeframes, from -0.05 (1 year) to 0.26 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ENPIX vs. UGPIX — Risk / Return Rank
ENPIX
UGPIX
ENPIX vs. UGPIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProFunds UltraSector Oil & Gas Fund (ENPIX) and ProFunds UltraChina (UGPIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ENPIX | UGPIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.23 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.68 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | 0.95 | +0.32 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.35 | -0.41 | +2.76 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.10 | -0.73 | +6.83 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ENPIX vs. UGPIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ENPIX drawdown since its inception was -90.12%, smaller than the maximum UGPIX drawdown of -98.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ENPIX and UGPIX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ENPIX | UGPIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -90.12% | -98.56% | +8.44% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -23.01% | -65.51% | +42.50% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -32.27% | -65.51% | +33.24% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -36.48% | -88.22% | +51.74% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -84.54% | -96.22% | +11.68% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.70% | -80.75% | +71.05% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -36.77% | -79.77% | +43.00% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.88% | 36.83% | -27.95% |
Volatility
ENPIX vs. UGPIX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for ProFunds UltraSector Oil & Gas Fund (ENPIX) is 9.02%, while ProFunds UltraChina (UGPIX) has a volatility of 13.99%. This indicates that ENPIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than UGPIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ENPIX | UGPIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.02% | 13.99% | -4.97% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 25.12% | 37.67% | -12.55% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 31.65% | 53.08% | -21.43% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 38.45% | 387.93% | -349.48% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 44.70% | 276.46% | -231.76% |
ENPIX vs. UGPIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
ENPIX has a 1.51% expense ratio, which is lower than UGPIX's 1.74% expense ratio.
Dividends
ENPIX vs. UGPIX - Dividend Comparison
ENPIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.86%, less than UGPIX's 8.93% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ENPIX ProFunds UltraSector Oil & Gas Fund | 1.86% | 2.76% | 3.19% | 0.87% | 2.76% | 1.59% | 1.76% | 1.34% | 1.76% | 0.84% | 0.57% | 0.56% |
UGPIX ProFunds UltraChina | 8.93% | 6.05% | 2.91% | 3.25% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.08% | 0.00% | 0.77% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ENPIX and UGPIX have a correlation of -0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
UGPIX has higher volatility (13.99%) compared to ENPIX (9.02%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ENPIX dropped -90.12% vs UGPIX's -98.56%.
ENPIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.71 vs -0.51), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ENPIX and UGPIX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer