PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ENPH vs. CDNS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

ENPH vs. CDNS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Enphase Energy, Inc. (ENPH) and Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (CDNS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ENPH achieves a 70.33% return, which is significantly higher than CDNS's 23.16% return. Over the past 10 years, ENPH has outperformed CDNS with an annualized return of 39.19%, while CDNS has yielded a comparatively lower 31.77% annualized return.


ENPH

1D
-0.62%
1M
29.98%
YTD
70.33%
6M
69.64%
1Y
22.14%
3Y*
-32.77%
5Y*
-17.99%
10Y*
39.19%

CDNS

1D
0.32%
1M
8.58%
YTD
23.16%
6M
19.10%
1Y
25.05%
3Y*
17.22%
5Y*
24.39%
10Y*
31.77%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ENPH vs. CDNS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ENPH
Enphase Energy, Inc.
70.33%-53.33%-48.02%-50.13%44.83%4.26%571.53%452.43%96.27%138.61%
CDNS
Cadence Design Systems, Inc.
23.16%4.03%10.31%69.55%-13.80%36.59%96.70%59.52%3.97%65.82%

Correlation

The correlation between ENPH and CDNS is 0.22, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.22

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.25

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.35

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.31

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 30, 2012

0.29

The correlation between ENPH and CDNS shifts across timeframes, from 0.22 (1 year) to 0.35 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

ENPH:

$7.17B

CDNS:

$105.37B

EPS

ENPH:

$0.92

CDNS:

$4.28

PE Ratio

ENPH:

59.58

CDNS:

89.86

PEG Ratio

ENPH:

1.36

CDNS:

6.85

PS Ratio

ENPH:

5.20

CDNS:

19.03

PB Ratio

ENPH:

6.50

CDNS:

12.08

Total Revenue (TTM)

ENPH:

$1.40B

CDNS:

$5.53B

Gross Profit (TTM)

ENPH:

$619.16M

CDNS:

$4.91B

EBITDA (TTM)

ENPH:

$189.48M

CDNS:

$1.87B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ENPH vs. CDNS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ENPH
ENPH Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
ENPH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ENPH Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
ENPH Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
ENPH Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
ENPH Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank

CDNS
CDNS Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
CDNS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CDNS Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
CDNS Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
CDNS Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
CDNS Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ENPH vs. CDNS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Enphase Energy, Inc. (ENPH) and Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (CDNS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ENPHCDNSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.39

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.13

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.14

1.15

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.52

0.87

-0.36

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.92

1.84

-0.92

ENPH vs. CDNS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ENPH Sharpe Ratio is 0.26, which is lower than the CDNS Sharpe Ratio of 0.65. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ENPH and CDNS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ENPH vs. CDNS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ENPH drawdown since its inception was -95.97%, roughly equal to the maximum CDNS drawdown of -93.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ENPH and CDNS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ENPHCDNSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-95.97%

-93.13%

-2.84%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-43.13%

-28.85%

-14.28%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-86.23%

-29.05%

-57.18%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-92.23%

-29.59%

-62.64%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-92.23%

-32.12%

-60.11%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-83.75%

-7.55%

-76.20%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-50.57%

-39.62%

-10.95%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

24.10%

13.63%

+10.47%

Volatility

ENPH vs. CDNS - Volatility Comparison

Enphase Energy, Inc. (ENPH) has a higher volatility of 40.41% compared to Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (CDNS) at 16.52%. This indicates that ENPH's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CDNS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ENPHCDNSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

40.41%

16.52%

+23.89%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

66.31%

31.73%

+34.58%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

86.85%

38.94%

+47.91%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

70.23%

36.17%

+34.06%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

78.26%

34.12%

+44.14%

Dividends

ENPH vs. CDNS - Dividend Comparison

Neither ENPH nor CDNS has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

ENPH vs. CDNS - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Enphase Energy, Inc. and Cadence Design Systems, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


200.00M400.00M600.00M800.00M1.00B1.20B1.40B20222023202420252026
282.90M
1.47B
(ENPH) Total Revenue
(CDNS) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

ENPH vs. CDNS - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Enphase Energy, Inc. and Cadence Design Systems, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

40.0%50.0%60.0%70.0%80.0%90.0%100.0%20222023202420252026
35.5%
95.9%
Portfolio components
ENPH - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Enphase Energy, Inc. reported a gross profit of 100.39M and revenue of 282.90M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 35.5%.

CDNS - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Cadence Design Systems, Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.41B and revenue of 1.47B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 95.9%.

ENPH - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Enphase Energy, Inc. reported an operating income of -29.64M and revenue of 282.90M, resulting in an operating margin of -10.5%.

CDNS - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Cadence Design Systems, Inc. reported an operating income of 431.33M and revenue of 1.47B, resulting in an operating margin of 29.3%.

ENPH - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Enphase Energy, Inc. reported a net income of -20.31M and revenue of 282.90M, resulting in a net margin of -7.2%.

CDNS - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Cadence Design Systems, Inc. reported a net income of 335.66M and revenue of 1.47B, resulting in a net margin of 22.8%.


Frequently Asked Questions


ENPH and CDNS have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ENPH has higher volatility (40.41%) compared to CDNS (16.52%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ENPH dropped -95.97% vs CDNS's -93.13%.

CDNS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.65 vs 0.26), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ENPH and CDNS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer