ENHU vs. FJUN
ENHU (iShares Enhanced Large Cap Core Active ETF) and FJUN (FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - June) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. ENHU is actively managed, while FJUN is passively managed. Their correlation of 0.91 suggests significant overlap in exposure. ENHU charges 0.22%/yr vs 0.85%/yr for FJUN.
Performance
ENHU vs. FJUN - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ENHU achieves a 8.83% return, which is significantly higher than FJUN's 4.00% return.
ENHU
- 1D
- -1.39%
- 1M
- -0.77%
- YTD
- 8.83%
- 6M
- 7.89%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FJUN
- 1D
- -0.80%
- 1M
- -0.44%
- YTD
- 4.00%
- 6M
- 3.80%
- 1Y
- 12.54%
- 3Y*
- 13.29%
- 5Y*
- 10.54%
- 10Y*
- —
ENHU vs. FJUN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
ENHU iShares Enhanced Large Cap Core Active ETF | 8.83% | 1.32% |
FJUN FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - June | 4.00% | 1.70% |
Correlation
The correlation between ENHU and FJUN is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 5, 2025 | 0.91 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ENHU vs. FJUN — Risk / Return Rank
ENHU
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
FJUN
ENHU vs. FJUN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Enhanced Large Cap Core Active ETF (ENHU) and FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - June (FJUN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ENHU | FJUN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.48 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 3.05 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 17.51 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ENHU vs. FJUN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ENHU drawdown since its inception was -8.98%, smaller than the maximum FJUN drawdown of -13.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ENHU and FJUN.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ENHU | FJUN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -8.98% | -13.26% | +4.28% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -4.13% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -13.26% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -13.26% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.53% | -0.97% | -1.56% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.51% | -1.66% | +0.15% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.72% | — |
Volatility
ENHU vs. FJUN - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ENHU | FJUN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 0.94% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 4.40% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.92% | 5.66% | +8.26% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.92% | 10.56% | +3.36% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.92% | 10.25% | +3.67% |
ENHU vs. FJUN - Expense Ratio Comparison
ENHU has a 0.22% expense ratio, which is lower than FJUN's 0.85% expense ratio.
Dividends
ENHU vs. FJUN - Dividend Comparison
ENHU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.51%, while FJUN has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
ENHU iShares Enhanced Large Cap Core Active ETF | 0.51% | 0.17% |
FJUN FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - June | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.91, ENHU and FJUN move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, ENHU is cheaper at 0.22% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ENHU is cheaper with a 0.22% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for FJUN.
ENHU has the higher dividend yield at 0.51%, compared with 0.00% for FJUN.
They also come from different issuers: iShares and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.22% for ENHU and 0.85% for FJUN.
Find the right allocation for ENHU and FJUN
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer