ENGW.L vs. XSEN.L

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

ENGW.L (SPDR MSCI World Energy UCITS ETF) and XSEN.L (Xtrackers MSCI USA Energy UCITS ETF 1D) are both Energy Equities funds tracking the MSCI World/Energy NR USD, from State Street and Xtrackers respectively. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, ENGW.L returned 16.05%/yr vs 14.40%/yr for XSEN.L. With a 0.98 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. ENGW.L charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.12%/yr for XSEN.L.

Performance

ENGW.L vs. XSEN.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in SPDR MSCI World Energy UCITS ETF (ENGW.L) and Xtrackers MSCI USA Energy UCITS ETF 1D (XSEN.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

ENGW.L is traded in GBP, while XSEN.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the XSEN.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with ENGW.L having a 31.48% return and XSEN.L slightly lower at 30.47%.

ENGW.L

• 1D: 2.24%
• 1M: 0.93%
• YTD: 31.48%
• 6M: 29.41%
• 1Y: 47.44%
• 3Y*: 16.05%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

XSEN.L

• 1D: 2.58%
• 1M: 1.11%
• YTD: 30.47%
• 6M: 29.01%
• 1Y: 43.63%
• 3Y*: 14.40%
• 5Y*: 21.45%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ENGW.L vs. XSEN.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
ENGW.L SPDR MSCI World Energy UCITS ETF	31.48%	7.20%	3.55%	-2.06%	20.65%
XSEN.L Xtrackers MSCI USA Energy UCITS ETF 1D	30.47%	1.87%	6.67%	-5.89%	26.92%

Correlation

The correlation between ENGW.L and XSEN.L is 0.97 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.97
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.97
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 5, 2022	0.98

The correlation between ENGW.L and XSEN.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.97 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

ENGW.L vs. XSEN.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ENGW.L

ENGW.L Risk / Return Rank: 63
ENGW.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 67
ENGW.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 56
ENGW.L Omega Ratio Rank: 66
ENGW.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 65
ENGW.L Martin Ratio Rank: 61

XSEN.L

XSEN.L Risk / Return Rank: 51
XSEN.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 54
XSEN.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 47
XSEN.L Omega Ratio Rank: 52
XSEN.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 54
XSEN.L Martin Ratio Rank: 50

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ENGW.L vs. XSEN.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR MSCI World Energy UCITS ETF (ENGW.L) and Xtrackers MSCI USA Energy UCITS ETF 1D (XSEN.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	ENGW.L	XSEN.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.23	1.83	+0.40
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.69	2.28	+0.41
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.40	1.32	+0.08
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.24	2.62	+0.62
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	10.79	8.24	+2.56
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

ENGW.L vs. XSEN.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ENGW.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.23, which is comparable to the XSEN.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.83. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ENGW.L and XSEN.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	ENGW.L	XSEN.L	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.23	1.83	+0.40
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.82	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.61	0.34	+0.27

Drawdowns

ENGW.L vs. XSEN.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ENGW.L drawdown since its inception was -21.65%, smaller than the maximum XSEN.L drawdown of -62.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ENGW.L and XSEN.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	ENGW.L	XSEN.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-21.65%	-62.46%	+40.81%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-14.56%	-16.55%	+1.99%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-21.40%	-23.22%	+1.82%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-24.04%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-7.08%	-9.02%	+1.94%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.76%	-17.79%	+9.03%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.38%	5.28%	-0.90%

Volatility

ENGW.L vs. XSEN.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SPDR MSCI World Energy UCITS ETF (ENGW.L) is 8.13%, while Xtrackers MSCI USA Energy UCITS ETF 1D (XSEN.L) has a volatility of 9.14%. This indicates that ENGW.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XSEN.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ENGW.L	XSEN.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	8.13%	9.14%	-1.01%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	18.03%	20.50%	-2.47%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	21.27%	23.87%	-2.60%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	22.80%	26.01%	-3.21%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	22.80%	29.44%	-6.64%

ENGW.L vs. XSEN.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

ENGW.L has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than XSEN.L's 0.12% expense ratio.

Dividends

ENGW.L vs. XSEN.L - Dividend Comparison

ENGW.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while XSEN.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.07%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
ENGW.L SPDR MSCI World Energy UCITS ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
XSEN.L Xtrackers MSCI USA Energy UCITS ETF 1D	2.07%	2.70%	2.70%	3.24%	3.69%	3.27%	7.11%	2.78%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ENGW.L and XSEN.L in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.97, ENGW.L and XSEN.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which ETF is better, ENGW.L or XSEN.L?

On fees, XSEN.L is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, ENGW.L or XSEN.L?

XSEN.L is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for ENGW.L.

What is the main difference between ENGW.L and XSEN.L?

Both ETFs track MSCI World/Energy NR USD. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for ENGW.L and 0.12% for XSEN.L.