PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
XSEN.L vs. GXLE.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

XSEN.L vs. GXLE.L

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Xtrackers MSCI USA Energy UCITS ETF 1D (XSEN.L) and SPDR S&P US Energy Select Sector UCITS ETF (GXLE.L).

XSEN.L and GXLE.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. XSEN.L is a passively managed fund by Xtrackers that tracks the performance of the MSCI World/Energy NR USD. It was launched on Sep 12, 2017. GXLE.L is a passively managed fund by State Street that tracks the performance of the MSCI World/Energy NR USD. It was launched on Jul 7, 2015. Both XSEN.L and GXLE.L are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.

Performance

XSEN.L vs. GXLE.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Xtrackers MSCI USA Energy UCITS ETF 1D (XSEN.L) and SPDR S&P US Energy Select Sector UCITS ETF (GXLE.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

XSEN.L vs. GXLE.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
XSEN.L
Xtrackers MSCI USA Energy UCITS ETF 1D		32.75%1.87%6.67%-5.89%26.92%
GXLE.L
SPDR S&P US Energy Select Sector UCITS ETF		33.17%2.22%5.51%-5.03%26.48%
Different Trading Currencies

XSEN.L is traded in GBp, while GXLE.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the GXLE.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with XSEN.L having a 32.75% return and GXLE.L slightly higher at 33.17%.

XSEN.L

1D
-6.77%
1M
4.50%
YTD
32.75%
6M
35.33%
1Y
25.73%
3Y*
13.28%
5Y*
24.14%
10Y*
—

GXLE.L

1D
-6.60%
1M
4.90%
YTD
33.17%
6M
36.23%
1Y
26.32%
3Y*
13.30%
5Y*
—
10Y*
—
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

Xtrackers MSCI USA Energy UCITS ETF 1D

SPDR S&P US Energy Select Sector UCITS ETF

Often compared with XSEN.L:
XSEN.L vs. NCLP.LXSEN.L vs. CWEU.LXSEN.L vs. EYED.LXSEN.L vs. RNRU.LXSEN.L vs. EXUS.LXSEN.L vs. ESIE.LXSEN.L vs. QCLN.L
Often compared with GXLE.L:
GXLE.L vs. XLEGXLE.L vs. GLDV.MIGXLE.L vs. VDEGXLE.L vs. NCLP.LGXLE.L vs. EYED.LGXLE.L vs. ESIE.LGXLE.L vs. QCLN.L

XSEN.L vs. GXLE.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

XSEN.L has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than GXLE.L's 0.15% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

GXLE.L
SPDR S&P US Energy Select Sector UCITS ETF
XSEN.L
Xtrackers MSCI USA Energy UCITS ETF 1D

Return for Risk

XSEN.L vs. GXLE.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
XSEN.L
XSEN.L Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
XSEN.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XSEN.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
XSEN.L Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
XSEN.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
XSEN.L Martin Ratio Rank: 4848
Martin Ratio Rank
GXLE.L
GXLE.L Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
GXLE.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GXLE.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
GXLE.L Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
GXLE.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
GXLE.L Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XSEN.L vs. GXLE.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI USA Energy UCITS ETF 1D (XSEN.L) and SPDR S&P US Energy Select Sector UCITS ETF (GXLE.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

XSEN.LGXLE.LDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.08

1.12

-0.04

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.47

1.50

-0.03

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

1.22

-0.01

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.96

1.99

-0.03

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

5.30

5.33

-0.04

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

XSEN.L vs. GXLE.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XSEN.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.08, which is comparable to the GXLE.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.12. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XSEN.L and GXLE.L, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

XSEN.LGXLE.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.08

1.12

-0.04

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.94

—

—

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.36

0.58

-0.22

Correlation

The correlation between XSEN.L and GXLE.L is 0.99, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

XSEN.L vs. GXLE.L - Dividend Comparison

XSEN.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.04%, while GXLE.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.

TTM2025202420232022202120202019
XSEN.L
Xtrackers MSCI USA Energy UCITS ETF 1D		2.04%2.70%2.70%3.24%3.69%3.27%7.11%2.78%
GXLE.L
SPDR S&P US Energy Select Sector UCITS ETF		0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

XSEN.L vs. GXLE.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XSEN.L drawdown since its inception was -62.46%, which is greater than GXLE.L's maximum drawdown of -23.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XSEN.L and GXLE.L.

Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators

XSEN.LGXLE.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-62.46%

-23.60%

-38.86%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-18.81%

-19.13%

+0.32%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.04%

—

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.43%

-7.19%

-0.24%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-17.93%

-10.76%

-7.17%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.79%

4.92%

-0.13%

Volatility

XSEN.L vs. GXLE.L - Volatility Comparison

Xtrackers MSCI USA Energy UCITS ETF 1D (XSEN.L) and SPDR S&P US Energy Select Sector UCITS ETF (GXLE.L) have volatilities of 10.13% and 9.94%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period

XSEN.LGXLE.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.13%

9.94%

+0.19%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.97%

15.62%

+0.35%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

23.68%

23.39%

+0.29%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

25.72%

25.06%

+0.66%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

29.32%

25.06%

+4.26%