XSEN.L vs. ESIE.L

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Xtrackers MSCI USA Energy UCITS ETF 1D (XSEN.L) and iShares MSCI Europe Energy Sector UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (ESIE.L).

XSEN.L and ESIE.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. XSEN.L is a passively managed fund by Xtrackers that tracks the performance of the MSCI World/Energy NR USD. It was launched on Sep 12, 2017. ESIE.L is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI World/Energy NR USD. It was launched on Nov 18, 2020. Both XSEN.L and ESIE.L are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.

Performance

XSEN.L vs. ESIE.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Xtrackers MSCI USA Energy UCITS ETF 1D (XSEN.L) and iShares MSCI Europe Energy Sector UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (ESIE.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

XSEN.L vs. ESIE.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
XSEN.L Xtrackers MSCI USA Energy UCITS ETF 1D	32.75%	1.87%	6.67%	-5.89%	82.86%	50.90%	-0.31%
ESIE.L iShares MSCI Europe Energy Sector UCITS ETF EUR (Acc)	37.70%	20.13%	-9.70%	6.04%	44.68%	26.96%	1.47%

Different Trading Currencies

XSEN.L is traded in GBp, while ESIE.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the ESIE.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XSEN.L achieves a 32.75% return, which is significantly lower than ESIE.L's 37.70% return.

XSEN.L

• 1D: -6.77%
• 1M: 4.50%
• YTD: 32.75%
• 6M: 35.33%
• 1Y: 25.73%
• 3Y*: 13.28%
• 5Y*: 24.14%
• 10Y*: —

ESIE.L

• 1D: -4.57%
• 1M: 12.93%
• YTD: 37.70%
• 6M: 43.65%
• 1Y: 46.63%
• 3Y*: 17.71%
• 5Y*: 21.80%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XSEN.L vs. ESIE.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

XSEN.L has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than ESIE.L's 0.18% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

ESIE.L

iShares MSCI Europe Energy Sector UCITS ETF EUR (Acc)

XSEN.L

Xtrackers MSCI USA Energy UCITS ETF 1D

Return for Risk

XSEN.L vs. ESIE.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XSEN.L

XSEN.L Risk / Return Rank: 56
XSEN.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 57
XSEN.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 52
XSEN.L Omega Ratio Rank: 53
XSEN.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 68
XSEN.L Martin Ratio Rank: 48

ESIE.L

ESIE.L Risk / Return Rank: 89
ESIE.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 90
ESIE.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 89
ESIE.L Omega Ratio Rank: 88
ESIE.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 91
ESIE.L Martin Ratio Rank: 89

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XSEN.L vs. ESIE.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI USA Energy UCITS ETF 1D (XSEN.L) and iShares MSCI Europe Energy Sector UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (ESIE.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	XSEN.L	ESIE.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.08	2.08	-1.00
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.47	2.57	-1.10
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.21	1.38	-0.17
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.96	3.50	-1.54
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	5.30	12.14	-6.84
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

XSEN.L vs. ESIE.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XSEN.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.08, which is lower than the ESIE.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.08. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XSEN.L and ESIE.L, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	XSEN.L	ESIE.L	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.08	2.08	-1.00
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.94	0.91	+0.03
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.36	0.92	-0.56

Correlation

The correlation between XSEN.L and ESIE.L is 0.75, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

XSEN.L vs. ESIE.L - Dividend Comparison

XSEN.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.04%, while ESIE.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
XSEN.L Xtrackers MSCI USA Energy UCITS ETF 1D	2.04%	2.70%	2.70%	3.24%	3.69%	3.27%	7.11%	2.78%
ESIE.L iShares MSCI Europe Energy Sector UCITS ETF EUR (Acc)	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

XSEN.L vs. ESIE.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XSEN.L drawdown since its inception was -62.46%, which is greater than ESIE.L's maximum drawdown of -27.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XSEN.L and ESIE.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	XSEN.L	ESIE.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-62.46%	-27.35%	-35.11%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-18.81%	-17.96%	-0.85%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-24.04%	-27.35%	+3.31%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-7.43%	-4.57%	-2.86%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-17.93%	-8.27%	-9.66%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.79%	3.98%	+0.81%

Volatility

XSEN.L vs. ESIE.L - Volatility Comparison

Xtrackers MSCI USA Energy UCITS ETF 1D (XSEN.L) has a higher volatility of 10.13% compared to iShares MSCI Europe Energy Sector UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (ESIE.L) at 9.51%. This indicates that XSEN.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ESIE.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	XSEN.L	ESIE.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	10.13%	9.51%	+0.62%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	15.97%	15.25%	+0.72%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	23.68%	22.31%	+1.37%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	25.72%	23.97%	+1.75%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	29.32%	24.32%	+5.00%