ENGW.L vs. IXC
Compare and contrast key facts about SPDR MSCI World Energy UCITS ETF (ENGW.L) and iShares Global Energy ETF (IXC).
ENGW.L and IXC are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. ENGW.L is a passively managed fund by State Street that tracks the performance of the MSCI World/Energy NR USD. It was launched on Apr 29, 2016. IXC is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the S&P Global Energy Sector Index. It was launched on Nov 16, 2001. Both ENGW.L and IXC are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: ENGW.L or IXC.
Key characteristics
| ENGW.L | IXC | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 9.24% | 8.50% |
| 1Y Return | 6.23% | 9.53% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 0.42 | 0.65 |
| Sortino Ratio | 0.67 | 0.96 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.08 | 1.12 |
| Calmar Ratio | 0.44 | 0.94 |
| Martin Ratio | 0.96 | 2.22 |
| Ulcer Index | 7.27% | 4.71% |
| Daily Std Dev | 16.73% | 16.20% |
| Max Drawdown | -21.65% | -67.88% |
| Current Drawdown | -6.67% | -5.19% |
Correlation
The correlation between ENGW.L and IXC is 0.79, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
ENGW.L vs. IXC - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, ENGW.L achieves a 9.24% return, which is significantly higher than IXC's 8.50% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
ENGW.L vs. IXC - Expense Ratio Comparison
ENGW.L has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than IXC's 0.46% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
ENGW.L vs. IXC - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR MSCI World Energy UCITS ETF (ENGW.L) and iShares Global Energy ETF (IXC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
ENGW.L vs. IXC - Dividend Comparison
ENGW.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while IXC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.69%.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ENGW.L SPDR MSCI World Energy UCITS ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
IXC iShares Global Energy ETF | 3.69% | 3.45% | 4.76% | 3.98% | 4.86% | 7.00% | 3.51% | 3.05% | 2.86% | 3.77% | 3.02% | 2.48% |
Drawdowns
ENGW.L vs. IXC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ENGW.L drawdown since its inception was -21.65%, smaller than the maximum IXC drawdown of -67.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ENGW.L and IXC. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
ENGW.L vs. IXC - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for SPDR MSCI World Energy UCITS ETF (ENGW.L) is 4.19%, while iShares Global Energy ETF (IXC) has a volatility of 4.85%. This indicates that ENGW.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IXC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.