ENFR vs. TSLY
ENFR (Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF) and TSLY (YieldMax TSLA Option Income Strategy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ENFR is a Energy Equities fund tracking the Alerian Midstream Energy Select Index, while TSLY is a Options Trading fund actively managed by YieldMax. ENFR is passively managed, while TSLY is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, ENFR returned 28.39%/yr vs 10.28%/yr for TSLY. At a 0.17 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. ENFR charges 0.35%/yr vs 1.07%/yr for TSLY.
Performance
ENFR vs. TSLY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ENFR achieves a 25.97% return, which is significantly higher than TSLY's -5.22% return.
ENFR
- 1D
- 0.73%
- 1M
- 0.52%
- YTD
- 25.97%
- 6M
- 26.39%
- 1Y
- 26.50%
- 3Y*
- 28.39%
- 5Y*
- 19.43%
- 10Y*
- 12.28%
TSLY
- 1D
- 1.66%
- 1M
- -6.99%
- YTD
- -5.22%
- 6M
- -7.03%
- 1Y
- 29.62%
- 3Y*
- 10.28%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ENFR vs. TSLY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ENFR Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF | 25.97% | 5.88% | 42.17% | 15.63% | -6.45% |
TSLY YieldMax TSLA Option Income Strategy ETF | -5.22% | 13.62% | 27.83% | 50.69% | -27.09% |
Correlation
The correlation between ENFR and TSLY is -0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.06 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.15 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 23, 2022 | 0.17 |
The correlation between ENFR and TSLY shifts across timeframes, from -0.06 (1 year) to 0.17 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ENFR vs. TSLY — Risk / Return Rank
ENFR
TSLY
ENFR vs. TSLY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF (ENFR) and YieldMax TSLA Option Income Strategy ETF (TSLY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ENFR | TSLY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.99 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.22 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.31 | 1.16 | +0.16 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.08 | 1.38 | +1.70 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.18 | 3.27 | +4.91 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ENFR vs. TSLY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ENFR drawdown since its inception was -68.28%, which is greater than TSLY's maximum drawdown of -49.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ENFR and TSLY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ENFR | TSLY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -68.28% | -49.52% | -18.76% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.64% | -21.64% | +13.00% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.58% | -49.52% | +33.94% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.29% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -62.64% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.91% | -11.38% | +7.47% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.95% | -19.92% | +3.97% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.25% | 9.09% | -5.84% |
Volatility
ENFR vs. TSLY - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF (ENFR) is 5.63%, while YieldMax TSLA Option Income Strategy ETF (TSLY) has a volatility of 12.68%. This indicates that ENFR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TSLY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ENFR | TSLY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.63% | 12.68% | -7.05% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.48% | 23.97% | -12.49% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.66% | 35.92% | -21.26% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.30% | 45.59% | -26.29% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.67% | 45.59% | -20.92% |
ENFR vs. TSLY - Expense Ratio Comparison
ENFR has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than TSLY's 1.07% expense ratio.
Dividends
ENFR vs. TSLY - Dividend Comparison
ENFR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.98%, less than TSLY's 83.90% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ENFR Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF | 3.98% | 4.77% | 4.41% | 5.48% | 5.23% | 7.86% | 7.57% | 5.81% | 3.98% | 2.98% | 3.31% | 3.34% |
TSLY YieldMax TSLA Option Income Strategy ETF | 83.90% | 91.19% | 82.30% | 76.47% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ENFR and TSLY have a correlation of -0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TSLY has higher volatility (12.68%) compared to ENFR (5.63%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ENFR dropped -68.28% vs TSLY's -49.52%.
On 3-year performance, ENFR leads with 28.39% vs 10.28% for TSLY. On fees, ENFR is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, ENFR has been the lower-risk option at 5.63%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, ENFR has performed better with a 28.39% return vs 10.28%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
ENFR is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 1.07% for TSLY.
TSLY has the higher dividend yield at 83.90%, compared with 3.98% for ENFR.
ENFR is categorized as Energy Equities, while TSLY is Options Trading. They also come from different issuers: SS&C and YieldMax. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for ENFR and 1.07% for TSLY.
ENFR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.82 vs 0.83), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ENFR and TSLY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer