ENFR vs. TMLPX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

ENFR (Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF) and TMLPX (Transamerica Energy Infrastructure) are both Energy Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, ENFR returned 11.96%/yr vs 9.38%/yr for TMLPX. Their correlation of 0.93 suggests significant overlap in exposure. ENFR charges 0.35%/yr vs 1.26%/yr for TMLPX.

Performance

ENFR vs. TMLPX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF (ENFR) and Transamerica Energy Infrastructure (TMLPX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ENFR achieves a 24.60% return, which is significantly higher than TMLPX's 21.52% return. Over the past 10 years, ENFR has outperformed TMLPX with an annualized return of 11.96%, while TMLPX has yielded a comparatively lower 9.38% annualized return.

ENFR

• 1D: 0.10%
• 1M: -1.01%
• YTD: 24.60%
• 6M: 24.41%
• 1Y: 25.40%
• 3Y*: 27.99%
• 5Y*: 19.91%
• 10Y*: 11.96%

TMLPX

• 1D: 1.84%
• 1M: -2.59%
• YTD: 21.52%
• 6M: 20.75%
• 1Y: 22.11%
• 3Y*: 22.94%
• 5Y*: 15.60%
• 10Y*: 9.38%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ENFR vs. TMLPX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
ENFR Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF	24.60%	5.88%	42.17%	15.63%	17.48%	39.97%	-24.14%	21.60%	-18.67%	-0.19%
TMLPX Transamerica Energy Infrastructure	21.52%	3.87%	38.51%	5.07%	9.12%	23.54%	-11.25%	15.66%	-15.29%	-0.19%

Correlation

The correlation between ENFR and TMLPX is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.96
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.95
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.95
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.93
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2014	0.93

The correlation between ENFR and TMLPX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

ENFR vs. TMLPX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ENFR

ENFR Risk / Return Rank: 50
ENFR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 50
ENFR Sortino Ratio Rank: 48
ENFR Omega Ratio Rank: 47
ENFR Calmar Ratio Rank: 59
ENFR Martin Ratio Rank: 48

TMLPX

TMLPX Risk / Return Rank: 42
TMLPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
TMLPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 31
TMLPX Omega Ratio Rank: 29
TMLPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 70
TMLPX Martin Ratio Rank: 45

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ENFR vs. TMLPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF (ENFR) and Transamerica Energy Infrastructure (TMLPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	ENFR	TMLPX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.75	1.66	+0.09
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.41	2.31	+0.09
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.30	1.29	+0.02
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.95	3.25	-0.30
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.06	9.37	-1.31
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

ENFR vs. TMLPX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ENFR Sharpe Ratio is 1.75, which is comparable to the TMLPX Sharpe Ratio of 1.66. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ENFR and TMLPX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	ENFR	TMLPX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.75	1.66	+0.09
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	1.04	0.91	+0.13
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.49	0.43	+0.05
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.34	0.23	+0.11

Drawdowns

ENFR vs. TMLPX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ENFR drawdown since its inception was -68.28%, roughly equal to the maximum TMLPX drawdown of -67.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ENFR and TMLPX.

Drawdown Indicators

	ENFR	TMLPX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-68.28%	-67.18%	-1.10%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.64%	-7.12%	-1.52%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-15.58%	-16.60%	+1.02%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-20.29%	-16.60%	-3.69%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-62.64%	-55.61%	-7.03%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.95%	-5.23%	+0.28%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-15.98%	-22.59%	+6.61%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.16%	2.47%	+0.69%

Volatility

ENFR vs. TMLPX - Volatility Comparison

Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF (ENFR) and Transamerica Energy Infrastructure (TMLPX) have volatilities of 6.18% and 6.08%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ENFR	TMLPX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.18%	6.08%	+0.10%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.47%	10.79%	+0.68%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.64%	14.05%	+0.59%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.30%	17.23%	+2.07%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	24.69%	21.80%	+2.89%

ENFR vs. TMLPX - Expense Ratio Comparison

ENFR has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than TMLPX's 1.26% expense ratio.

Dividends

ENFR vs. TMLPX - Dividend Comparison

ENFR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.03%, more than TMLPX's 3.72% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
ENFR Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF	4.03%	4.77%	4.41%	5.48%	5.23%	7.86%	7.57%	5.81%	3.98%	2.98%	3.31%	3.34%
TMLPX Transamerica Energy Infrastructure	3.72%	4.33%	3.71%	7.34%	4.83%	4.33%	6.09%	5.65%	6.10%	5.51%	3.95%	5.58%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ENFR and TMLPX in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.96, ENFR and TMLPX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, ENFR or TMLPX?

ENFR has higher volatility (6.18%) compared to TMLPX (6.08%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ENFR dropped -68.28% vs TMLPX's -67.18%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

ENFR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.75 vs 1.66), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.