ENFR vs. PBOG
ENFR (Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF) and PBOG (Portfolio Building Block Integrated Oil & Gas and Exploration & Production Index ETF) are both Energy Equities funds - ENFR tracks the Alerian Midstream Energy Select Index while PBOG tracks the BITA Global Oil & Gas Select Index. Both are passively managed. A 0.69 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ENFR charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.13%/yr for PBOG.
Performance
ENFR vs. PBOG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ENFR achieves a 24.93% return, which is significantly higher than PBOG's 20.33% return.
ENFR
- 1D
- 1.51%
- 1M
- -4.52%
- YTD
- 24.93%
- 6M
- 25.03%
- 1Y
- 27.76%
- 3Y*
- 28.90%
- 5Y*
- 20.07%
- 10Y*
- 11.98%
PBOG
- 1D
- 0.25%
- 1M
- -9.73%
- YTD
- 20.33%
- 6M
- 21.36%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ENFR vs. PBOG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
ENFR Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF | 24.93% | 2.16% |
PBOG Portfolio Building Block Integrated Oil & Gas and Exploration & Production Index ETF | 20.33% | 1.39% |
Correlation
The correlation between ENFR and PBOG is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 25, 2025 | 0.69 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ENFR vs. PBOG — Risk / Return Rank
ENFR
PBOG
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
ENFR vs. PBOG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF (ENFR) and Portfolio Building Block Integrated Oil & Gas and Exploration & Production Index ETF (PBOG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ENFR | PBOG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.23 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.24 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ENFR vs. PBOG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ENFR drawdown since its inception was -68.28%, which is greater than PBOG's maximum drawdown of -16.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ENFR and PBOG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ENFR | PBOG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -68.28% | -16.46% | -51.82% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.64% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.58% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.29% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -62.64% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.71% | -15.19% | +10.48% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.94% | -3.86% | -12.08% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.38% | — | — |
Volatility
ENFR vs. PBOG - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ENFR | PBOG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.69% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.60% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.86% | 23.95% | -9.09% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.25% | 23.95% | -4.70% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.68% | 23.95% | +0.73% |
ENFR vs. PBOG - Expense Ratio Comparison
ENFR has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than PBOG's 0.13% expense ratio.
Dividends
ENFR vs. PBOG - Dividend Comparison
ENFR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.02%, more than PBOG's 0.14% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ENFR Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF | 4.02% | 4.77% | 4.41% | 5.48% | 5.23% | 7.86% | 7.57% | 5.81% | 3.98% | 2.98% | 3.31% | 3.34% |
PBOG Portfolio Building Block Integrated Oil & Gas and Exploration & Production Index ETF | 0.14% | 0.17% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ENFR and PBOG have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, PBOG is cheaper at 0.13% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
PBOG is cheaper with a 0.13% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for ENFR.
ENFR has the higher dividend yield at 4.02%, compared with 0.14% for PBOG.
ENFR tracks Alerian Midstream Energy Select Index, while PBOG tracks BITA Global Oil & Gas Select Index. They also come from different issuers: SS&C and Portfolio Building Blocks. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for ENFR and 0.13% for PBOG.
Find the right allocation for ENFR and PBOG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer