ENFR vs. OILT
Compare and contrast key facts about Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF (ENFR) and Texas Capital Texas Oil Index ETF (OILT).
ENFR and OILT are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. ENFR is a passively managed fund by SS&C that tracks the performance of the Alerian Midstream Energy Select Index. It was launched on Nov 1, 2013. OILT is a passively managed fund by Texas Capital that tracks the performance of the Alerian Texas Weighted Oil and Gas Index - Benchmark TR Gross. It was launched on Dec 20, 2023. Both ENFR and OILT are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
ENFR vs. OILT - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
ENFR vs. OILT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
ENFR Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF | 22.85% | 5.88% | 42.17% | 0.43% |
OILT Texas Capital Texas Oil Index ETF | 44.81% | -3.30% | 0.87% | -0.16% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ENFR achieves a 22.85% return, which is significantly lower than OILT's 44.81% return.
ENFR
- 1D
- -1.39%
- 1M
- 4.03%
- YTD
- 22.85%
- 6M
- 20.70%
- 1Y
- 22.29%
- 3Y*
- 28.68%
- 5Y*
- 23.59%
- 10Y*
- 13.64%
OILT
- 1D
- -1.68%
- 1M
- 17.56%
- YTD
- 44.81%
- 6M
- 44.96%
- 1Y
- 38.48%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
ENFR vs. OILT - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both ENFR and OILT have an expense ratio of 0.35%.
Return for Risk
ENFR vs. OILT — Risk / Return Rank
ENFR
OILT
ENFR vs. OILT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF (ENFR) and Texas Capital Texas Oil Index ETF (OILT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ENFR | OILT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.25 | 1.12 | +0.13 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.63 | 1.58 | +0.05 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | 1.22 | +0.03 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.49 | 1.64 | -0.15 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.94 | 4.58 | +0.36 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ENFR | OILT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.25 | 1.12 | +0.13 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.24 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.55 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.34 | 0.58 | -0.24 |
Correlation
The correlation between ENFR and OILT is 0.58, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
ENFR vs. OILT - Dividend Comparison
ENFR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.02%, more than OILT's 2.27% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ENFR Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF | 4.02% | 4.77% | 4.41% | 5.48% | 5.23% | 7.86% | 7.57% | 5.81% | 3.98% | 2.98% | 3.31% | 3.34% |
OILT Texas Capital Texas Oil Index ETF | 2.27% | 3.12% | 2.63% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
ENFR vs. OILT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ENFR drawdown since its inception was -68.28%, which is greater than OILT's maximum drawdown of -35.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ENFR and OILT.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| ENFR | OILT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -68.28% | -35.21% | -33.07% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.80% | -24.58% | +9.78% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.29% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -62.64% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.18% | -2.28% | +0.10% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.16% | -13.25% | -2.91% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.47% | 8.83% | -4.36% |
Volatility
ENFR vs. OILT - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF (ENFR) is 3.72%, while Texas Capital Texas Oil Index ETF (OILT) has a volatility of 6.20%. This indicates that ENFR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than OILT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| ENFR | OILT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.72% | 6.20% | -2.48% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.21% | 18.58% | -8.37% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.91% | 34.47% | -16.56% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.18% | 28.31% | -9.13% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.74% | 28.31% | -3.57% |