ENFR vs. EVIM
ENFR (Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF) and EVIM (Eaton Vance Intermediate Municipal Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ENFR is a Energy Equities fund tracking the Alerian Midstream Energy Select Index, while EVIM is a Municipal Bonds fund actively managed by Eaton Vance. ENFR is passively managed, while EVIM is actively managed. Over the past year, ENFR returned 30.52% vs 7.21% for EVIM. At a correlation of -0.01, they often move in opposite directions. ENFR charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.29%/yr for EVIM.
Performance
ENFR vs. EVIM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ENFR achieves a 29.25% return, which is significantly higher than EVIM's 1.81% return.
ENFR
- 1D
- 0.53%
- 1M
- 2.60%
- 6M
- 28.45%
- YTD
- 29.25%
- 1Y
- 30.52%
- 3Y*
- 28.29%
- 5Y*
- 21.98%
- 10Y*
- 11.80%
EVIM
- 1D
- 0.06%
- 1M
- 0.44%
- 6M
- 1.20%
- YTD
- 1.81%
- 1Y
- 7.21%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ENFR vs. EVIM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
ENFR Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF | 29.25% | 5.88% | 42.17% | 3.30% |
EVIM Eaton Vance Intermediate Municipal Income ETF | 1.81% | 5.85% | 1.65% | 6.83% |
Correlation
The correlation between ENFR and EVIM is -0.24, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.24 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 19, 2023 | -0.01 |
Over the past year, the inverse relationship between ENFR and EVIM has strengthened: their correlation has moved from -0.01 to -0.24, meaning they now move in opposite directions more often than their long-term average.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ENFR vs. EVIM — Risk / Return Rank
ENFR
EVIM
ENFR vs. EVIM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF (ENFR) and Eaton Vance Intermediate Municipal Income ETF (EVIM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ENFR | EVIM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.57 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.07 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | 1.61 | -0.26 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.55 | 2.37 | +1.18 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.73 | 7.56 | +1.17 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ENFR vs. EVIM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ENFR drawdown since its inception was -68.28%, which is greater than EVIM's maximum drawdown of -4.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ENFR and EVIM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ENFR | EVIM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -68.28% | -4.23% | -64.05% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.64% | -3.05% | -5.59% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.58% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.29% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -62.64% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.41% | -0.58% | -0.83% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.88% | -0.87% | -15.01% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.51% | 0.96% | +2.55% |
Volatility
ENFR vs. EVIM - Volatility Comparison
Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF (ENFR) has a higher volatility of 5.62% compared to Eaton Vance Intermediate Municipal Income ETF (EVIM) at 0.65%. This indicates that ENFR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EVIM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ENFR | EVIM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.62% | 0.65% | +4.97% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.06% | 2.00% | +10.06% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.18% | 2.79% | +12.39% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.27% | 3.80% | +15.47% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.65% | 3.80% | +20.85% |
ENFR vs. EVIM - Expense Ratio Comparison
ENFR has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than EVIM's 0.29% expense ratio.
Dividends
ENFR vs. EVIM - Dividend Comparison
ENFR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.88%, more than EVIM's 3.52% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ENFR Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF | 3.88% | 4.77% | 4.41% | 5.48% | 5.23% | 7.86% | 7.57% | 5.81% | 3.98% | 2.98% | 3.31% | 3.34% |
EVIM Eaton Vance Intermediate Municipal Income ETF | 3.52% | 3.58% | 3.56% | 0.78% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ENFR and EVIM have a correlation of -0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ENFR has higher volatility (5.62%) compared to EVIM (0.65%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ENFR dropped -68.28% vs EVIM's -4.23%.
On 1-year performance, ENFR leads with 30.52% vs 7.21% for EVIM. On fees, EVIM is cheaper at 0.29% per year. On volatility, EVIM has been the lower-risk option at 0.65%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, ENFR has performed better with a 30.52% return vs 7.21%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
EVIM is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for ENFR.
ENFR has the higher dividend yield at 3.88%, compared with 3.52% for EVIM.
ENFR is categorized as Energy Equities, while EVIM is Municipal Bonds. They also come from different issuers: SS&C and Eaton Vance. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for ENFR and 0.29% for EVIM.
EVIM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.60 vs 2.02), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ENFR and EVIM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer