ENFR vs. DIV
ENFR (Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF) and DIV (Global X SuperDividend U.S. ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ENFR is a Energy Equities fund tracking the Alerian Midstream Energy Select Index, while DIV is a Mid Cap Value Equities fund tracking the Indxx SuperDividend® U.S. Low Volatility Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, ENFR returned 12.28%/yr vs 4.30%/yr for DIV. A 0.65 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ENFR charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for DIV.
Performance
ENFR vs. DIV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ENFR achieves a 25.97% return, which is significantly higher than DIV's 14.48% return. Over the past 10 years, ENFR has outperformed DIV with an annualized return of 12.28%, while DIV has yielded a comparatively lower 4.30% annualized return.
ENFR
- 1D
- 0.73%
- 1M
- 0.52%
- YTD
- 25.97%
- 6M
- 26.39%
- 1Y
- 26.50%
- 3Y*
- 28.39%
- 5Y*
- 19.43%
- 10Y*
- 12.28%
DIV
- 1D
- 0.68%
- 1M
- 1.40%
- YTD
- 14.48%
- 6M
- 13.33%
- 1Y
- 15.73%
- 3Y*
- 11.89%
- 5Y*
- 5.31%
- 10Y*
- 4.30%
ENFR vs. DIV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ENFR Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF | 25.97% | 5.88% | 42.17% | 15.63% | 17.48% | 39.97% | -24.14% | 21.60% | -18.67% | -0.19% |
DIV Global X SuperDividend U.S. ETF | 14.48% | 3.10% | 11.27% | -1.73% | -3.92% | 30.60% | -22.85% | 14.50% | -6.60% | 9.90% |
Correlation
The correlation between ENFR and DIV is 0.37, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.37 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.55 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.65 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.64 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 1, 2013 | 0.65 |
Over the past year, the correlation between ENFR and DIV has dropped to 0.37 - well below their long-term average of 0.65, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
ENFR vs. DIV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
ENFR
DIV
Energy
Industrials
Utilities
Financial Services
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Healthcare
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
-
-
Energy
ENFR
DIV
Industrials
ENFR
DIV
Utilities
ENFR
DIV
Financial Services
ENFR
DIV
Basic Materials
ENFR
-
DIV
Communication Services
ENFR
-
DIV
Consumer Cyclical
ENFR
-
DIV
Consumer Defensive
ENFR
-
DIV
Healthcare
ENFR
-
DIV
Real Estate
ENFR
-
DIV
Technology
ENFR
-
DIV
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ENFR vs. DIV — Risk / Return Rank
ENFR
DIV
ENFR vs. DIV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF (ENFR) and Global X SuperDividend U.S. ETF (DIV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ENFR | DIV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.29 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.32 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.31 | 1.26 | +0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.08 | 3.02 | +0.06 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.18 | 8.43 | -0.25 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ENFR vs. DIV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ENFR drawdown since its inception was -68.28%, which is greater than DIV's maximum drawdown of -52.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ENFR and DIV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ENFR | DIV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -68.28% | -52.74% | -15.54% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.64% | -5.23% | -3.41% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.58% | -12.33% | -3.25% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.29% | -21.14% | +0.85% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -62.64% | -52.74% | -9.90% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.91% | -0.73% | -3.18% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.95% | -7.01% | -8.94% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.25% | 1.88% | +1.37% |
Volatility
ENFR vs. DIV - Volatility Comparison
Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF (ENFR) has a higher volatility of 5.63% compared to Global X SuperDividend U.S. ETF (DIV) at 3.07%. This indicates that ENFR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DIV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ENFR | DIV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.63% | 3.07% | +2.56% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.48% | 7.08% | +4.40% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.66% | 10.32% | +4.34% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.30% | 13.69% | +5.61% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.67% | 17.98% | +6.69% |
ENFR vs. DIV - Expense Ratio Comparison
ENFR has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than DIV's 0.45% expense ratio.
Dividends
ENFR vs. DIV - Dividend Comparison
ENFR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.98%, less than DIV's 6.61% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DIV Global X SuperDividend U.S. ETF | 6.61% | 7.30% | 5.74% | 7.13% | 6.62% | 5.24% | 8.01% | 7.65% | 7.08% | 5.92% | 6.78% | 8.44% |
ENFR Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF | 3.98% | 4.77% | 4.41% | 5.48% | 5.23% | 7.86% | 7.57% | 5.81% | 3.98% | 2.98% | 3.31% | 3.34% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ENFR and DIV have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ENFR has higher volatility (5.63%) compared to DIV (3.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ENFR dropped -68.28% vs DIV's -52.74%.
On 10-year performance, ENFR leads with 12.28% vs 4.30% for DIV. On fees, ENFR is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, DIV has been the lower-risk option at 3.07%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, ENFR has performed better with a 12.28% return vs 4.30%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
ENFR is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for DIV.
DIV has the higher dividend yield at 6.61%, compared with 3.98% for ENFR.
ENFR is categorized as Energy Equities, while DIV is Mid Cap Value Equities. ENFR tracks Alerian Midstream Energy Select Index, while DIV tracks Indxx SuperDividend® U.S. Low Volatility Index. They also come from different issuers: SS&C and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for ENFR and 0.45% for DIV.
ENFR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.82 vs 1.53), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ENFR and DIV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer