ENFR vs. ACES
Compare and contrast key facts about Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF (ENFR) and ALPS Clean Energy ETF (ACES).
ENFR and ACES are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. ENFR is a passively managed fund by SS&C that tracks the performance of the Alerian Midstream Energy Select Index. It was launched on Nov 1, 2013. ACES is a passively managed fund by SS&C that tracks the performance of the CIBC Atlas Clean Energy Index. It was launched on Jun 29, 2018. Both ENFR and ACES are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
ENFR vs. ACES - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
ENFR vs. ACES - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ENFR Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF | 22.85% | 5.88% | 42.17% | 15.63% | 17.48% | 39.97% | -24.14% | 21.60% | -16.70% |
ACES ALPS Clean Energy ETF | 3.39% | 25.44% | -26.71% | -20.04% | -28.44% | -19.44% | 140.33% | 51.70% | -9.63% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ENFR achieves a 22.85% return, which is significantly higher than ACES's 3.39% return.
ENFR
- 1D
- -1.39%
- 1M
- 4.03%
- YTD
- 22.85%
- 6M
- 20.70%
- 1Y
- 22.29%
- 3Y*
- 28.68%
- 5Y*
- 23.59%
- 10Y*
- 13.64%
ACES
- 1D
- 4.26%
- 1M
- 2.79%
- YTD
- 3.39%
- 6M
- 5.24%
- 1Y
- 47.29%
- 3Y*
- -9.44%
- 5Y*
- -14.81%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
ENFR vs. ACES - Expense Ratio Comparison
ENFR has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than ACES's 0.55% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
ENFR vs. ACES — Risk / Return Rank
ENFR
ACES
ENFR vs. ACES - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF (ENFR) and ALPS Clean Energy ETF (ACES). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ENFR | ACES | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.25 | 1.36 | -0.11 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.63 | 1.93 | -0.30 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | 1.23 | +0.02 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.49 | 2.66 | -1.17 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.94 | 6.60 | -1.66 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ENFR | ACES | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.25 | 1.36 | -0.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.24 | -0.41 | +1.65 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.55 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.34 | 0.14 | +0.21 |
Correlation
The correlation between ENFR and ACES is 0.41, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
ENFR vs. ACES - Dividend Comparison
ENFR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.02%, more than ACES's 0.68% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ENFR Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF | 4.02% | 4.77% | 4.41% | 5.48% | 5.23% | 7.86% | 7.57% | 5.81% | 3.98% | 2.98% | 3.31% | 3.34% |
ACES ALPS Clean Energy ETF | 0.68% | 0.70% | 1.10% | 1.44% | 1.08% | 0.71% | 0.56% | 1.79% | 0.34% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
ENFR vs. ACES - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ENFR drawdown since its inception was -68.28%, smaller than the maximum ACES drawdown of -79.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ENFR and ACES.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| ENFR | ACES | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -68.28% | -79.05% | +10.77% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.80% | -17.44% | +2.64% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.29% | -74.44% | +54.15% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -62.64% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.18% | -64.99% | +62.81% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.16% | -38.35% | +22.19% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.47% | 7.03% | -2.56% |
Volatility
ENFR vs. ACES - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF (ENFR) is 3.72%, while ALPS Clean Energy ETF (ACES) has a volatility of 10.50%. This indicates that ENFR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ACES based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| ENFR | ACES | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.72% | 10.50% | -6.78% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.21% | 25.76% | -15.55% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.91% | 35.00% | -17.09% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.18% | 36.22% | -17.04% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.74% | 35.71% | -10.97% |