ENEL.MI vs. PG
ENEL.MI (Enel SpA) and PG (The Procter & Gamble Company) are both stocks. ENEL.MI operates in Utilities - Diversified (Utilities), while PG operates in Household & Personal Products (Consumer Defensive). Over the past 10 years, ENEL.MI returned 15.79%/yr vs 8.61%/yr for PG. At a 0.15 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
ENEL.MI vs. PG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
ENEL.MI is traded in EUR, while PG is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the PG values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ENEL.MI achieves a 13.01% return, which is significantly higher than PG's 7.56% return. Over the past 10 years, ENEL.MI has outperformed PG with an annualized return of 15.79%, while PG has yielded a comparatively lower 8.61% annualized return.
ENEL.MI
- 1D
- 1.35%
- 1M
- 0.72%
- YTD
- 13.01%
- 6M
- 15.09%
- 1Y
- 29.94%
- 3Y*
- 24.05%
- 5Y*
- 10.38%
- 10Y*
- 15.79%
PG
- 1D
- 0.94%
- 1M
- 5.77%
- YTD
- 7.56%
- 6M
- 7.85%
- 1Y
- -4.12%
- 3Y*
- 1.31%
- 5Y*
- 5.69%
- 10Y*
- 8.61%
ENEL.MI vs. PG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ENEL.MI Enel SpA | 13.01% | 36.75% | 8.35% | 42.63% | -23.74% | -11.11% | 22.02% | 47.36% | 2.97% | 27.49% |
PG The Procter & Gamble Company | 7.56% | -22.67% | 24.99% | -3.83% | 0.84% | 29.54% | 4.74% | 42.86% | 8.43% | -1.16% |
Correlation
The correlation between ENEL.MI and PG is 0.15, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.15 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.09 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.10 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.14 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 5, 2007 | 0.15 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ENEL.MI vs. PG — Risk / Return Rank
ENEL.MI
PG
ENEL.MI vs. PG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Enel SpA (ENEL.MI) and The Procter & Gamble Company (PG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ENEL.MI | PG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.81 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.42 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | 0.97 | +0.32 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.65 | -0.39 | +3.04 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.83 | -0.69 | +8.51 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ENEL.MI vs. PG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ENEL.MI drawdown since its inception was -56.40%, which is greater than PG's maximum drawdown of -34.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ENEL.MI and PG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ENEL.MI | PG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -56.40% | -34.76% | -21.64% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.99% | -14.28% | +3.29% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.88% | -29.10% | +15.22% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -47.08% | -29.10% | -17.98% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -50.13% | -29.11% | -21.02% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.93% | -21.31% | +17.38% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.15% | -8.50% | -6.65% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.72% | 8.61% | -4.89% |
Volatility
ENEL.MI vs. PG - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Enel SpA (ENEL.MI) is 5.33%, while The Procter & Gamble Company (PG) has a volatility of 7.48%. This indicates that ENEL.MI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ENEL.MI | PG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.33% | 7.48% | -2.15% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.28% | 14.93% | +2.35% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.27% | 18.53% | +0.74% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.09% | 18.16% | +2.93% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.78% | 19.71% | +3.07% |
Dividends
ENEL.MI vs. PG - Dividend Comparison
ENEL.MI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.95%, more than PG's 2.85% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ENEL.MI Enel SpA | 4.95% | 4.98% | 5.44% | 5.56% | 7.55% | 5.08% | 3.96% | 3.96% | 4.70% | 3.51% | 3.82% | 3.60% |
PG The Procter & Gamble Company | 2.85% | 2.91% | 2.36% | 2.55% | 2.38% | 2.08% | 2.24% | 2.37% | 3.09% | 2.98% | 3.18% | 3.31% |
Financials
ENEL.MI vs. PG - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Enel SpA and The Procter & Gamble Company. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
ENEL.MI and PG have a correlation of 0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for ENEL.MI and PG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer