ENDW vs. NMBL

Last updated Jul 14, 2026

ENDW (Cambria Endowment Style ETF) and NMBL (NovaTide Flexible Allocation ETF) are both Global Allocation funds. Both are actively managed. Their correlation of 0.83 suggests significant overlap in exposure. ENDW charges 0.29%/yr vs 1.99%/yr for NMBL.

Performance

ENDW vs. NMBL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Cambria Endowment Style ETF (ENDW) and NovaTide Flexible Allocation ETF (NMBL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ENDW achieves a 10.35% return, which is significantly higher than NMBL's 3.17% return.

ENDW

• 1D: -0.28%
• 1M: -0.30%
• 6M: 7.10%
• YTD: 10.35%
• 1Y: 23.12%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

NMBL

• 1D: -1.06%
• 1M: -0.78%
• 6M: 0.58%
• YTD: 3.17%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ENDW vs. NMBL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
ENDW Cambria Endowment Style ETF	10.35%	2.06%
NMBL NovaTide Flexible Allocation ETF	3.17%	-0.27%

Correlation

The correlation between ENDW and NMBL is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 31, 2025	0.83

Return for Risk

ENDW vs. NMBL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ENDW

ENDW Risk / Return Rank: 85
ENDW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 87
ENDW Sortino Ratio Rank: 85
ENDW Omega Ratio Rank: 85
ENDW Calmar Ratio Rank: 84
ENDW Martin Ratio Rank: 86

NMBL

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ENDW vs. NMBL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cambria Endowment Style ETF (ENDW) and NovaTide Flexible Allocation ETF (NMBL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	ENDW	NMBL	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.23	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.02	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.41	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.61	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	13.90	—	—

Drawdowns

ENDW vs. NMBL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ENDW drawdown since its inception was -6.44%, smaller than the maximum NMBL drawdown of -8.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ENDW and NMBL.

Drawdown Indicators

	ENDW	NMBL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-6.44%	-8.05%	+1.61%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.44%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.99%	-4.13%	+3.14%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.88%	-2.15%	+1.27%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.67%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	ENDW	NMBL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.03%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.19%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.41%	13.27%	-2.86%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	11.13%	13.27%	-2.14%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	11.13%	13.27%	-2.14%

ENDW vs. NMBL - Expense Ratio Comparison

ENDW has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is lower than NMBL's 1.99% expense ratio.

Dividends

ENDW vs. NMBL - Dividend Comparison

ENDW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.47%, more than NMBL's 0.90% yield.

Position	TTM	2025
ENDW Cambria Endowment Style ETF	2.47%	1.91%
NMBL NovaTide Flexible Allocation ETF	0.90%	0.93%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ENDW and NMBL in my portfolio?

ENDW and NMBL have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, ENDW or NMBL?

On fees, ENDW is cheaper at 0.29% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, ENDW or NMBL?

ENDW is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 1.99% for NMBL.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, ENDW or NMBL?

ENDW has the higher dividend yield at 2.47%, compared with 0.90% for NMBL.

What is the main difference between ENDW and NMBL?

They also come from different issuers: Cambria and NovaTide. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for ENDW and 1.99% for NMBL.