ENB vs. PAGP
ENB (Enbridge Inc.) and PAGP (Plains GP Holdings, L.P.) are both stocks. Both operate in the Oil & Gas Midstream industry within the Energy sector. Over the past 10 years, ENB returned 9.34%/yr vs 6.02%/yr for PAGP. A 0.51 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.
Performance
ENB vs. PAGP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ENB achieves a 18.72% return, which is significantly lower than PAGP's 33.60% return. Over the past 10 years, ENB has outperformed PAGP with an annualized return of 9.34%, while PAGP has yielded a comparatively lower 6.02% annualized return.
ENB
- 1D
- -1.74%
- 1M
- 4.56%
- YTD
- 18.72%
- 6M
- 17.84%
- 1Y
- 25.57%
- 3Y*
- 20.90%
- 5Y*
- 13.89%
- 10Y*
- 9.34%
PAGP
- 1D
- 0.70%
- 1M
- 6.21%
- YTD
- 33.60%
- 6M
- 36.96%
- 1Y
- 43.47%
- 3Y*
- 29.22%
- 5Y*
- 22.80%
- 10Y*
- 6.02%
ENB vs. PAGP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ENB Enbridge Inc. | 18.72% | 19.51% | 26.35% | -1.13% | 6.46% | 30.83% | -13.60% | 36.05% | -15.53% | -2.73% |
PAGP Plains GP Holdings, L.P. | 33.60% | 12.69% | 23.64% | 38.09% | 31.78% | 28.97% | -51.17% | 0.30% | -3.49% | -32.11% |
Correlation
The correlation between ENB and PAGP is 0.37, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.37 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.43 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.53 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.51 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 17, 2013 | 0.51 |
The correlation between ENB and PAGP shifts across timeframes, from 0.37 (1 year) to 0.53 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
ENB:
$4.92
PAGP:
$2.23
ENB:
11.24
PAGP:
11.03
ENB:
0.51
PAGP:
0.15
ENB:
1.32
PAGP:
0.18
ENB:
$69.05B
PAGP:
$45.26B
ENB:
$15.35B
PAGP:
$2.07B
ENB:
$17.09B
PAGP:
$2.44B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ENB vs. PAGP — Risk / Return Rank
ENB
PAGP
ENB vs. PAGP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Enbridge Inc. (ENB) and Plains GP Holdings, L.P. (PAGP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ENB | PAGP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.85 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.95 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | 1.41 | -0.13 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.82 | 3.02 | -0.20 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.09 | 8.86 | -1.76 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ENB | PAGP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.58 | 2.43 | -0.85 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.75 | 0.84 | -0.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.39 | 0.14 | +0.24 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.53 | -0.01 | +0.53 |
Drawdowns
ENB vs. PAGP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ENB drawdown since its inception was -46.35%, smaller than the maximum PAGP drawdown of -94.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ENB and PAGP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ENB | PAGP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -46.35% | -94.21% | +47.86% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.10% | -14.44% | +5.34% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.78% | -21.02% | +5.24% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.32% | -23.89% | -4.43% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -44.07% | -88.04% | +43.97% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.67% | -34.35% | +29.68% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.83% | -57.72% | +46.89% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.62% | 4.92% | -1.30% |
Volatility
ENB vs. PAGP - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Enbridge Inc. (ENB) is 6.10%, while Plains GP Holdings, L.P. (PAGP) has a volatility of 6.71%. This indicates that ENB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PAGP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ENB | PAGP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.10% | 6.71% | -0.61% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.00% | 13.28% | -0.28% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.24% | 18.01% | -1.77% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.64% | 27.38% | -8.74% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.34% | 41.75% | -17.41% |
Dividends
ENB vs. PAGP - Dividend Comparison
ENB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.01%, less than PAGP's 6.48% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ENB Enbridge Inc. | 5.01% | 5.66% | 6.28% | 7.31% | 6.80% | 6.85% | 7.55% | 5.58% | 6.68% | 4.71% | 4.13% | 4.71% |
PAGP Plains GP Holdings, L.P. | 6.48% | 7.94% | 6.91% | 6.71% | 6.69% | 7.10% | 10.65% | 7.28% | 5.97% | 8.88% | 6.91% | 9.34% |
Financials
ENB vs. PAGP - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Enbridge Inc. and Plains GP Holdings, L.P.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
ENB vs. PAGP - Profitability Comparison
ENB - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Enbridge Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 22.36B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
PAGP - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Plains GP Holdings, L.P. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 12.47B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
ENB - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Enbridge Inc. reported an operating income of 3.23B and revenue of 22.36B, resulting in an operating margin of 14.4%.
PAGP - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Plains GP Holdings, L.P. reported an operating income of 405.00M and revenue of 12.47B, resulting in an operating margin of 3.3%.
ENB - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Enbridge Inc. reported a net income of 2.95B and revenue of 22.36B, resulting in a net margin of 13.2%.
PAGP - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Plains GP Holdings, L.P. reported a net income of 551.00M and revenue of 12.47B, resulting in a net margin of 4.4%.
Frequently Asked Questions
ENB and PAGP have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PAGP has higher volatility (6.71%) compared to ENB (6.10%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ENB dropped -46.35% vs PAGP's -94.21%.
PAGP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.43 vs 1.58), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ENB and PAGP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer