ENB.TO vs. HAP
ENB.TO (Enbridge Inc.) is a stock, while HAP (VanEck Natural Resources ETF) is Energy Equities fund tracking the MarketVector Global Natural Resources Index. Over the past 10 years, ENB.TO returned 10.59%/yr vs 12.91%/yr for HAP. At a 0.38 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
ENB.TO vs. HAP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
ENB.TO is traded in CAD, while HAP is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the HAP values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ENB.TO achieves a 23.42% return, which is significantly higher than HAP's 20.84% return. Over the past 10 years, ENB.TO has underperformed HAP with an annualized return of 10.59%, while HAP has yielded a comparatively higher 12.91% annualized return.
ENB.TO
- 1D
- 0.13%
- 1M
- 3.74%
- YTD
- 23.42%
- 6M
- 23.83%
- 1Y
- 31.58%
- 3Y*
- 24.19%
- 5Y*
- 17.63%
- 10Y*
- 10.59%
HAP
- 1D
- 1.39%
- 1M
- -0.45%
- YTD
- 20.84%
- 6M
- 20.95%
- 1Y
- 42.22%
- 3Y*
- 18.80%
- 5Y*
- 14.48%
- 10Y*
- 12.91%
ENB.TO vs. HAP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ENB.TO Enbridge Inc. | 23.42% | 14.09% | 37.18% | -3.28% | 13.96% | 29.98% | -15.30% | 29.43% | -8.30% | -8.84% |
HAP VanEck Natural Resources ETF | 20.84% | 28.75% | 4.04% | 0.03% | 14.67% | 24.98% | 3.77% | 13.71% | -3.17% | 9.19% |
Correlation
The correlation between ENB.TO and HAP is 0.10, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.10 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.29 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.42 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.39 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 3, 2008 | 0.38 |
Over the past year, the correlation between ENB.TO and HAP has dropped to 0.10 - well below their long-term average of 0.38, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ENB.TO vs. HAP — Risk / Return Rank
ENB.TO
HAP
ENB.TO vs. HAP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Enbridge Inc. (ENB.TO) and VanEck Natural Resources ETF (HAP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ENB.TO | HAP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.68 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.64 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | 1.47 | -0.14 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.30 | 5.41 | -2.12 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.61 | 20.72 | -12.11 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ENB.TO vs. HAP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ENB.TO drawdown since its inception was -39.47%, roughly equal to the maximum HAP drawdown of -40.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ENB.TO and HAP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ENB.TO | HAP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -39.47% | -40.28% | +0.81% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.42% | -7.85% | -1.57% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -11.56% | -14.67% | +3.11% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.38% | -22.99% | +1.61% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -39.47% | -38.93% | -0.54% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.51% | -2.79% | +1.28% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.34% | -7.79% | -0.55% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.66% | 2.05% | +1.61% |
Volatility
ENB.TO vs. HAP - Volatility Comparison
Enbridge Inc. (ENB.TO) has a higher volatility of 5.97% compared to VanEck Natural Resources ETF (HAP) at 5.41%. This indicates that ENB.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HAP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ENB.TO | HAP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.97% | 5.41% | +0.56% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.62% | 13.25% | -0.63% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.64% | 15.87% | -0.23% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.69% | 19.12% | -3.43% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.43% | 20.59% | +1.84% |
Dividends
ENB.TO vs. HAP - Dividend Comparison
ENB.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.84%, more than HAP's 1.91% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ENB.TO Enbridge Inc. | 4.84% | 5.74% | 6.00% | 7.44% | 6.50% | 6.76% | 7.96% | 5.72% | 6.33% | 4.91% | 3.75% | 4.04% |
HAP VanEck Natural Resources ETF | 1.91% | 2.27% | 2.65% | 3.27% | 3.28% | 2.16% | 2.45% | 2.80% | 2.85% | 2.02% | 1.99% | 3.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ENB.TO and HAP have a correlation of 0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for ENB.TO and HAP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer