EMXF vs. IWM

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

EMXF (iShares ESG Advanced MSCI EM ETF) and IWM (iShares Russell 2000 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - EMXF is a Emerging Markets Equities fund tracking the MSCI Emerging Markets Choice ESG Screened 5% Issuer Capped Index, while IWM is a Small Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Russell 2000 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, EMXF returned 7.15%/yr vs 6.11%/yr for IWM. A 0.56 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. EMXF charges 0.16%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for IWM.

Performance

EMXF vs. IWM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares ESG Advanced MSCI EM ETF (EMXF) and iShares Russell 2000 ETF (IWM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EMXF achieves a 24.76% return, which is significantly higher than IWM's 17.07% return.

EMXF

• 1D: -1.30%
• 1M: 8.70%
• YTD: 24.76%
• 6M: 27.57%
• 1Y: 47.21%
• 3Y*: 21.67%
• 5Y*: 7.15%
• 10Y*: —

IWM

• 1D: -1.37%
• 1M: 3.52%
• YTD: 17.07%
• 6M: 15.83%
• 1Y: 39.10%
• 3Y*: 17.88%
• 5Y*: 6.11%
• 10Y*: 10.93%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EMXF vs. IWM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
EMXF iShares ESG Advanced MSCI EM ETF	24.76%	29.40%	8.03%	6.63%	-18.99%	4.45%	15.32%
IWM iShares Russell 2000 ETF	17.07%	12.66%	11.38%	16.83%	-20.48%	14.54%	20.88%

Correlation

The correlation between EMXF and IWM is 0.65, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.65
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.59
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.56
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 14, 2020	0.56

The correlation between EMXF and IWM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.56 to 0.65 - a consistent structural relationship.

EMXF vs. IWM - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	EMXF	IWM
Technology	35.2%	19.5%
Financial Services	32.2%	15.8%
Communication Services	8.0%	2.0%
Consumer Cyclical	5.7%	7.8%
Industrials	5.5%	17.1%
Healthcare	4.2%	15.8%
Consumer Defensive	2.9%	2.1%
Basic Materials	2.6%	4.5%
Real Estate	1.7%	5.7%
Utilities	0.6%	3.0%
Energy	0.0%	6.0%

Return for Risk

EMXF vs. IWM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EMXF

EMXF Risk / Return Rank: 77
EMXF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 78
EMXF Sortino Ratio Rank: 76
EMXF Omega Ratio Rank: 78
EMXF Calmar Ratio Rank: 75
EMXF Martin Ratio Rank: 76

IWM

IWM Risk / Return Rank: 62
IWM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 59
IWM Sortino Ratio Rank: 59
IWM Omega Ratio Rank: 53
IWM Calmar Ratio Rank: 70
IWM Martin Ratio Rank: 67

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EMXF vs. IWM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares ESG Advanced MSCI EM ETF (EMXF) and iShares Russell 2000 ETF (IWM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	EMXF	IWM	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.55	2.05	+0.50
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.42	2.85	+0.56
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.47	1.34	+0.13
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.79	3.56	+0.22
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	14.56	12.64	+1.91
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

EMXF vs. IWM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EMXF Sharpe Ratio is 2.55, which is comparable to the IWM Sharpe Ratio of 2.05. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EMXF and IWM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	EMXF	IWM	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.55	2.05	+0.50
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.32	0.27	+0.05
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.48	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.51	0.37	+0.15

Drawdowns

EMXF vs. IWM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EMXF drawdown since its inception was -33.13%, smaller than the maximum IWM drawdown of -59.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EMXF and IWM.

Drawdown Indicators

	EMXF	IWM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-33.13%	-59.05%	+25.92%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.53%	-11.03%	-1.50%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-15.93%	-27.50%	+11.57%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-32.89%	-31.91%	-0.98%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-41.13%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.30%	-1.49%	+0.19%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-12.02%	-10.77%	-1.25%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.25%	3.10%	+0.15%

Volatility

EMXF vs. IWM - Volatility Comparison

iShares ESG Advanced MSCI EM ETF (EMXF) has a higher volatility of 8.10% compared to iShares Russell 2000 ETF (IWM) at 5.75%. This indicates that EMXF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IWM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	EMXF	IWM	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	8.10%	5.75%	+2.35%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	16.13%	13.53%	+2.60%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	18.60%	19.20%	-0.60%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	22.15%	22.52%	-0.37%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.77%	23.04%	-1.27%

EMXF vs. IWM - Expense Ratio Comparison

EMXF has a 0.16% expense ratio, which is lower than IWM's 0.19% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

EMXF vs. IWM - Dividend Comparison

EMXF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.75%, more than IWM's 0.88% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
EMXF iShares ESG Advanced MSCI EM ETF	2.75%	3.43%	2.92%	2.25%	2.42%	1.87%	0.41%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
IWM iShares Russell 2000 ETF	0.88%	1.04%	1.15%	1.35%	1.48%	0.94%	1.04%	1.26%	1.40%	1.26%	1.38%	1.54%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both EMXF and IWM in my portfolio?

EMXF and IWM have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, EMXF or IWM?

EMXF has higher volatility (8.10%) compared to IWM (5.75%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EMXF dropped -33.13% vs IWM's -59.05%.

Which ETF is better, EMXF or IWM?

On 5-year performance, EMXF leads with 7.15% vs 6.11% for IWM. On fees, EMXF is cheaper at 0.16% per year. On volatility, IWM has been the lower-risk option at 5.75%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, EMXF or IWM?

Over the 5-year period, EMXF has performed better with a 7.15% return vs 6.11%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, EMXF or IWM?

EMXF is cheaper with a 0.16% expense ratio, compared with 0.19% for IWM.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, EMXF or IWM?

EMXF has the higher dividend yield at 2.75%, compared with 0.88% for IWM.

What is the main difference between EMXF and IWM?

EMXF is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while IWM is Small Cap Blend Equities. EMXF tracks MSCI Emerging Markets Choice ESG Screened 5% Issuer Capped Index, while IWM tracks Russell 2000 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.16% for EMXF and 0.19% for IWM.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

EMXF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.55 vs 2.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.