PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EMXF vs. IBIT
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

EMXF vs. IBIT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares ESG Advanced MSCI EM ETF (EMXF) and iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF (IBIT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

EMXF vs. IBIT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
EMXF
iShares ESG Advanced MSCI EM ETF
3.68%29.40%10.78%
IBIT
iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF
-22.18%-6.41%99.21%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EMXF achieves a 3.68% return, which is significantly higher than IBIT's -22.18% return.


EMXF

1D
0.84%
1M
-5.02%
YTD
3.68%
6M
8.34%
1Y
30.12%
3Y*
14.51%
5Y*
4.42%
10Y*

IBIT

1D
0.57%
1M
-1.42%
YTD
-22.18%
6M
-42.10%
1Y
-20.00%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


EMXF vs. IBIT - Expense Ratio Comparison

EMXF has a 0.16% expense ratio, which is lower than IBIT's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Return for Risk

EMXF vs. IBIT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EMXF
EMXF Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
EMXF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EMXF Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
EMXF Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
EMXF Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
EMXF Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank

IBIT
IBIT Risk / Return Rank: 66
Overall Rank
IBIT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IBIT Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
Sortino Ratio Rank
IBIT Omega Ratio Rank: 66
Omega Ratio Rank
IBIT Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
Calmar Ratio Rank
IBIT Martin Ratio Rank: 66
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EMXF vs. IBIT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares ESG Advanced MSCI EM ETF (EMXF) and iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF (IBIT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EMXFIBITDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.63

-0.44

+2.07

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.21

-0.37

+2.58

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

0.96

+0.36

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.46

-0.35

+2.81

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

9.50

-0.75

+10.25

EMXF vs. IBIT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EMXF Sharpe Ratio is 1.63, which is higher than the IBIT Sharpe Ratio of -0.44. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EMXF and IBIT, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EMXFIBITDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.63

-0.44

+2.07

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.20

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.36

0.36

0.00

Correlation

The correlation between EMXF and IBIT is 0.35, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

EMXF vs. IBIT - Dividend Comparison

EMXF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.31%, while IBIT has not paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM202520242023202220212020
EMXF
iShares ESG Advanced MSCI EM ETF
3.31%3.43%2.92%2.25%2.42%1.87%0.41%
IBIT
iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

EMXF vs. IBIT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EMXF drawdown since its inception was -33.13%, smaller than the maximum IBIT drawdown of -49.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EMXF and IBIT.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


EMXFIBITDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.13%

-49.36%

+16.23%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.53%

-49.36%

+36.83%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.89%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.84%

-45.80%

+36.96%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.34%

-14.18%

+1.84%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.24%

23.27%

-20.03%

Volatility

EMXF vs. IBIT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares ESG Advanced MSCI EM ETF (EMXF) is 8.78%, while iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF (IBIT) has a volatility of 12.95%. This indicates that EMXF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IBIT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


EMXFIBITDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.78%

12.95%

-4.17%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.61%

36.76%

-23.15%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.57%

45.40%

-26.83%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.82%

51.21%

-29.39%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.61%

51.21%

-29.60%