PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EMXF vs. EVLU
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EMXF vs. EVLU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares ESG Advanced MSCI EM ETF (EMXF) and iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Value Factor ETF (EVLU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EMXF achieves a 24.26% return, which is significantly lower than EVLU's 28.98% return.


EMXF

1D
-4.12%
1M
5.10%
YTD
24.26%
6M
24.79%
1Y
43.07%
3Y*
21.44%
5Y*
7.11%
10Y*

EVLU

1D
-3.07%
1M
3.10%
YTD
28.98%
6M
30.29%
1Y
59.59%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EMXF vs. EVLU - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
EMXF
iShares ESG Advanced MSCI EM ETF
24.26%29.40%0.95%
EVLU
iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Value Factor ETF
28.98%38.54%1.21%

Correlation

The correlation between EMXF and EVLU is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.90

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 6, 2024

0.91

The correlation between EMXF and EVLU has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EMXF vs. EVLU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EMXF
EMXF Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
EMXF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EMXF Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
EMXF Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
EMXF Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
EMXF Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank

EVLU
EVLU Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
EVLU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EVLU Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
EVLU Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
EVLU Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
EVLU Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EMXF vs. EVLU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares ESG Advanced MSCI EM ETF (EMXF) and iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Value Factor ETF (EVLU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


EMXFEVLUDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.84

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.91

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.40

1.53

-0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.45

4.64

-1.19

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.92

16.27

-3.35

EMXF vs. EVLU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EMXF Sharpe Ratio is 2.13, which is comparable to the EVLU Sharpe Ratio of 2.97. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EMXF and EVLU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

EMXF vs. EVLU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EMXF drawdown since its inception was -33.13%, which is greater than EVLU's maximum drawdown of -17.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EMXF and EVLU.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EMXFEVLUDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.13%

-17.17%

-15.96%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.53%

-12.90%

+0.37%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.93%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.89%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.12%

-5.94%

+1.82%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.93%

-3.52%

-8.41%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.34%

3.67%

-0.33%

Volatility

EMXF vs. EVLU - Volatility Comparison

iShares ESG Advanced MSCI EM ETF (EMXF) has a higher volatility of 10.32% compared to iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Value Factor ETF (EVLU) at 9.29%. This indicates that EMXF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EVLU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EMXFEVLUDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.32%

9.29%

+1.03%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.35%

17.64%

+0.71%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.37%

20.18%

+0.19%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.50%

20.36%

+2.14%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.99%

20.36%

+1.63%

EMXF vs. EVLU - Expense Ratio Comparison

EMXF has a 0.16% expense ratio, which is lower than EVLU's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

EMXF vs. EVLU - Dividend Comparison

EMXF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.67%, less than EVLU's 3.77% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020
EMXF
iShares ESG Advanced MSCI EM ETF
2.67%3.43%2.92%2.25%2.42%1.87%0.41%
EVLU
iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Value Factor ETF
3.77%5.20%1.03%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.90, EMXF and EVLU move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

EMXF has higher volatility (10.32%) compared to EVLU (9.29%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EMXF dropped -33.13% vs EVLU's -17.17%.

On 1-year performance, EVLU leads with 59.59% vs 43.07% for EMXF. On fees, EMXF is cheaper at 0.16% per year. On volatility, EVLU has been the lower-risk option at 9.29%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, EVLU has performed better with a 59.59% return vs 43.07%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

EMXF is cheaper with a 0.16% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for EVLU.

EVLU has the higher dividend yield at 3.77%, compared with 2.67% for EMXF.

EMXF tracks MSCI Emerging Markets Choice ESG Screened 5% Issuer Capped Index, while EVLU tracks MSCI Emerging Markets Value Factor Select Index (Net). Their fees differ too: 0.16% for EMXF and 0.35% for EVLU.

EVLU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.97 vs 2.13), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EMXF and EVLU

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer