EMXF vs. EMOP
EMXF (iShares ESG Advanced MSCI EM ETF) and EMOP (AB Emerging Markets Opportunities ETF) are both Emerging Markets Equities funds. EMXF is passively managed, while EMOP is actively managed. Their correlation of 0.92 suggests significant overlap in exposure. EMXF charges 0.16%/yr vs 0.70%/yr for EMOP.
Performance
EMXF vs. EMOP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EMXF achieves a 24.76% return, which is significantly lower than EMOP's 32.56% return.
EMXF
- 1D
- -1.30%
- 1M
- 8.70%
- YTD
- 24.76%
- 6M
- 27.57%
- 1Y
- 47.21%
- 3Y*
- 21.67%
- 5Y*
- 7.15%
- 10Y*
- —
EMOP
- 1D
- -0.72%
- 1M
- 8.86%
- YTD
- 32.56%
- 6M
- 34.94%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
EMXF vs. EMOP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
EMXF iShares ESG Advanced MSCI EM ETF | 24.76% | 15.37% |
EMOP AB Emerging Markets Opportunities ETF | 32.56% | 16.69% |
Correlation
The correlation between EMXF and EMOP is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 20, 2025 | 0.92 |
EMXF vs. EMOP - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
EMXF
EMOP
Technology
Financial Services
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Basic Materials
Real Estate
Utilities
Energy
Technology
EMXF
EMOP
Financial Services
EMXF
EMOP
Communication Services
EMXF
EMOP
Consumer Cyclical
EMXF
EMOP
Industrials
EMXF
EMOP
Healthcare
EMXF
EMOP
Consumer Defensive
EMXF
EMOP
Basic Materials
EMXF
EMOP
Real Estate
EMXF
EMOP
Utilities
EMXF
EMOP
Energy
EMXF
EMOP
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EMXF vs. EMOP — Risk / Return Rank
EMXF
EMOP
EMXF vs. EMOP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares ESG Advanced MSCI EM ETF (EMXF) and AB Emerging Markets Opportunities ETF (EMOP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EMXF | EMOP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.47 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.79 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.56 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EMXF | EMOP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.55 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.32 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.51 | 2.93 | -2.42 |
Drawdowns
EMXF vs. EMOP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EMXF drawdown since its inception was -33.13%, which is greater than EMOP's maximum drawdown of -12.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EMXF and EMOP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EMXF | EMOP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.13% | -12.88% | -20.25% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.53% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.93% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -32.89% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.30% | -0.72% | -0.58% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.02% | -1.90% | -10.12% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.25% | — | — |
Volatility
EMXF vs. EMOP - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EMXF | EMOP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.10% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.13% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.60% | 19.85% | -1.25% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.15% | 19.85% | +2.30% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.77% | 19.85% | +1.92% |
EMXF vs. EMOP - Expense Ratio Comparison
EMXF has a 0.16% expense ratio, which is lower than EMOP's 0.70% expense ratio.
Dividends
EMXF vs. EMOP - Dividend Comparison
EMXF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.75%, more than EMOP's 0.82% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EMOP AB Emerging Markets Opportunities ETF | 0.82% | 0.27% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
EMXF iShares ESG Advanced MSCI EM ETF | 2.75% | 3.43% | 2.92% | 2.25% | 2.42% | 1.87% | 0.41% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.92, EMXF and EMOP move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, EMXF is cheaper at 0.16% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
EMXF is cheaper with a 0.16% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for EMOP.
EMXF has the higher dividend yield at 2.75%, compared with 0.82% for EMOP.
They also come from different issuers: iShares and AllianceBernstein. Their fees differ too: 0.16% for EMXF and 0.70% for EMOP.
Find the right allocation for EMXF and EMOP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer