PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EMXF vs. EMOP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EMXF vs. EMOP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares ESG Advanced MSCI EM ETF (EMXF) and AB Emerging Markets Opportunities ETF (EMOP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EMXF achieves a 24.76% return, which is significantly lower than EMOP's 32.56% return.


EMXF

1D
-1.30%
1M
8.70%
YTD
24.76%
6M
27.57%
1Y
47.21%
3Y*
21.67%
5Y*
7.15%
10Y*

EMOP

1D
-0.72%
1M
8.86%
YTD
32.56%
6M
34.94%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EMXF vs. EMOP - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
EMXF
iShares ESG Advanced MSCI EM ETF
24.76%15.37%
EMOP
AB Emerging Markets Opportunities ETF
32.56%16.69%

Correlation

The correlation between EMXF and EMOP is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 20, 2025

0.92

EMXF vs. EMOP - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
EMXF
EMOP

Technology

35.2%
30.3%

Financial Services

32.2%
24.0%

Communication Services

8.0%
12.3%

Consumer Cyclical

5.7%
7.8%

Industrials

5.5%
8.1%

Healthcare

4.2%
1.6%

Consumer Defensive

2.9%
1.4%

Basic Materials

2.6%
7.0%

Real Estate

1.7%
2.3%

Utilities

0.6%
2.8%

Energy

0.0%
2.6%

Technology

EMXF
35.2%
EMOP
30.3%

Financial Services

EMXF
32.2%
EMOP
24.0%

Communication Services

EMXF
8.0%
EMOP
12.3%

Consumer Cyclical

EMXF
5.7%
EMOP
7.8%

Industrials

EMXF
5.5%
EMOP
8.1%

Healthcare

EMXF
4.2%
EMOP
1.6%

Consumer Defensive

EMXF
2.9%
EMOP
1.4%

Basic Materials

EMXF
2.6%
EMOP
7.0%

Real Estate

EMXF
1.7%
EMOP
2.3%

Utilities

EMXF
0.6%
EMOP
2.8%

Energy

EMXF
0.0%
EMOP
2.6%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EMXF vs. EMOP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EMXF
EMXF Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
EMXF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EMXF Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
EMXF Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
EMXF Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
EMXF Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank

EMOP
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EMXF vs. EMOP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares ESG Advanced MSCI EM ETF (EMXF) and AB Emerging Markets Opportunities ETF (EMOP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EMXFEMOPDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.47

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.79

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.56

EMXF vs. EMOP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EMXFEMOPDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.55

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.32

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.51

2.93

-2.42

Drawdowns

EMXF vs. EMOP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EMXF drawdown since its inception was -33.13%, which is greater than EMOP's maximum drawdown of -12.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EMXF and EMOP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EMXFEMOPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.13%

-12.88%

-20.25%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.53%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.93%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.89%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.30%

-0.72%

-0.58%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.02%

-1.90%

-10.12%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.25%

Volatility

EMXF vs. EMOP - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EMXFEMOPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.10%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.13%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.60%

19.85%

-1.25%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.15%

19.85%

+2.30%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.77%

19.85%

+1.92%

EMXF vs. EMOP - Expense Ratio Comparison

EMXF has a 0.16% expense ratio, which is lower than EMOP's 0.70% expense ratio.


Dividends

EMXF vs. EMOP - Dividend Comparison

EMXF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.75%, more than EMOP's 0.82% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020
EMOP
AB Emerging Markets Opportunities ETF
0.82%0.27%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
EMXF
iShares ESG Advanced MSCI EM ETF
2.75%3.43%2.92%2.25%2.42%1.87%0.41%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.92, EMXF and EMOP move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, EMXF is cheaper at 0.16% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

EMXF is cheaper with a 0.16% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for EMOP.

EMXF has the higher dividend yield at 2.75%, compared with 0.82% for EMOP.

They also come from different issuers: iShares and AllianceBernstein. Their fees differ too: 0.16% for EMXF and 0.70% for EMOP.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EMXF and EMOP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer