PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EMXF vs. ECOW
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

EMXF vs. ECOW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares ESG Advanced MSCI EM ETF (EMXF) and Pacer Emerging Markets Cash Cows 100 ETF (ECOW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

EMXF vs. ECOW - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
EMXF
iShares ESG Advanced MSCI EM ETF
2.81%29.40%8.03%6.63%-18.99%4.45%15.32%
ECOW
Pacer Emerging Markets Cash Cows 100 ETF
9.29%32.50%3.17%15.79%-19.28%7.47%16.02%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EMXF achieves a 2.81% return, which is significantly lower than ECOW's 9.29% return.


EMXF

1D
3.35%
1M
-8.16%
YTD
2.81%
6M
8.14%
1Y
29.67%
3Y*
14.20%
5Y*
4.25%
10Y*

ECOW

1D
2.44%
1M
-4.14%
YTD
9.29%
6M
12.97%
1Y
37.65%
3Y*
18.71%
5Y*
6.93%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


EMXF vs. ECOW - Expense Ratio Comparison

EMXF has a 0.16% expense ratio, which is lower than ECOW's 0.70% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

EMXF vs. ECOW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EMXF
EMXF Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
EMXF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EMXF Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
EMXF Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
EMXF Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
EMXF Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank

ECOW
ECOW Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
ECOW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ECOW Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
ECOW Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
ECOW Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
ECOW Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EMXF vs. ECOW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares ESG Advanced MSCI EM ETF (EMXF) and Pacer Emerging Markets Cash Cows 100 ETF (ECOW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EMXFECOWDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.61

2.28

-0.67

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.19

2.87

-0.68

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.46

-0.14

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.38

2.85

-0.48

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

9.33

14.23

-4.90

EMXF vs. ECOW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EMXF Sharpe Ratio is 1.61, which is comparable to the ECOW Sharpe Ratio of 2.28. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EMXF and ECOW, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EMXFECOWDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.61

2.28

-0.67

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.20

0.39

-0.20

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.36

0.36

0.00

Correlation

The correlation between EMXF and ECOW is 0.67, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

EMXF vs. ECOW - Dividend Comparison

EMXF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.34%, less than ECOW's 4.76% yield.


TTM2025202420232022202120202019
EMXF
iShares ESG Advanced MSCI EM ETF
3.34%3.43%2.92%2.25%2.42%1.87%0.41%0.00%
ECOW
Pacer Emerging Markets Cash Cows 100 ETF
4.76%5.20%7.35%5.46%7.50%4.39%3.35%8.08%

Drawdowns

EMXF vs. ECOW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EMXF drawdown since its inception was -33.13%, smaller than the maximum ECOW drawdown of -40.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EMXF and ECOW.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


EMXFECOWDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.13%

-40.27%

+7.14%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.53%

-13.09%

+0.56%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.89%

-33.67%

+0.78%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.60%

-4.82%

-4.78%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.34%

-11.29%

-1.05%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.19%

2.63%

+0.56%

Volatility

EMXF vs. ECOW - Volatility Comparison

iShares ESG Advanced MSCI EM ETF (EMXF) has a higher volatility of 9.71% compared to Pacer Emerging Markets Cash Cows 100 ETF (ECOW) at 7.25%. This indicates that EMXF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ECOW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


EMXFECOWDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.71%

7.25%

+2.46%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.59%

11.25%

+2.34%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.56%

16.60%

+1.96%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.82%

17.66%

+4.16%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.61%

20.26%

+1.35%