EMXC.L vs. XEMD.L
Compare and contrast key facts about Lyxor MSCI Emerging Markets Ex China UCITS ETF - Acc (EMXC.L) and Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF 1D (XEMD.L).
EMXC.L and XEMD.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. EMXC.L is a passively managed fund by Amundi that tracks the performance of the MSCI EM NR USD. It was launched on Jun 20, 2019. XEMD.L is a passively managed fund by Xtrackers that tracks the performance of the MSCI EM NR USD. It was launched on Nov 3, 2021. Both EMXC.L and XEMD.L are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
EMXC.L vs. XEMD.L - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
EMXC.L vs. XEMD.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EMXC.L Lyxor MSCI Emerging Markets Ex China UCITS ETF - Acc | 9.06% | 35.24% | 3.14% | 18.63% | -18.80% | 0.36% |
XEMD.L Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF 1D | 5.44% | 33.32% | 7.21% | 10.03% | -20.21% | -3.35% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EMXC.L achieves a 9.06% return, which is significantly higher than XEMD.L's 5.44% return.
EMXC.L
- 1D
- 4.79%
- 1M
- -6.73%
- YTD
- 9.06%
- 6M
- 18.83%
- 1Y
- 48.03%
- 3Y*
- 20.64%
- 5Y*
- 8.78%
- 10Y*
- —
XEMD.L
- 1D
- 4.24%
- 1M
- -5.82%
- YTD
- 5.44%
- 6M
- 8.75%
- 1Y
- 34.45%
- 3Y*
- 16.43%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
EMXC.L vs. XEMD.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
EMXC.L has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than XEMD.L's 0.18% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Return for Risk
EMXC.L vs. XEMD.L — Risk / Return Rank
EMXC.L
XEMD.L
EMXC.L vs. XEMD.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lyxor MSCI Emerging Markets Ex China UCITS ETF - Acc (EMXC.L) and Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF 1D (XEMD.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EMXC.L | XEMD.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.38 | 1.84 | +0.54 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.02 | 2.38 | +0.64 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.44 | 1.35 | +0.09 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.37 | 2.33 | +1.04 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.44 | 8.70 | +4.74 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EMXC.L | XEMD.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.38 | 1.84 | +0.54 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.52 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.50 | 0.40 | +0.10 |
Correlation
The correlation between EMXC.L and XEMD.L is 0.64, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
EMXC.L vs. XEMD.L - Dividend Comparison
EMXC.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while XEMD.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.63%.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EMXC.L Lyxor MSCI Emerging Markets Ex China UCITS ETF - Acc | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XEMD.L Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF 1D | 1.63% | 1.63% | 2.88% | 2.15% | 2.52% |
Drawdowns
EMXC.L vs. XEMD.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EMXC.L drawdown since its inception was -40.52%, which is greater than XEMD.L's maximum drawdown of -31.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EMXC.L and XEMD.L.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| EMXC.L | XEMD.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -40.52% | -31.57% | -8.95% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.14% | -13.23% | -0.91% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.58% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.78% | -9.13% | -0.65% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.08% | -9.69% | +0.61% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.54% | 3.84% | -0.30% |
Volatility
EMXC.L vs. XEMD.L - Volatility Comparison
Lyxor MSCI Emerging Markets Ex China UCITS ETF - Acc (EMXC.L) has a higher volatility of 9.83% compared to Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF 1D (XEMD.L) at 8.77%. This indicates that EMXC.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XEMD.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| EMXC.L | XEMD.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.83% | 8.77% | +1.06% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.61% | 14.12% | +1.49% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.10% | 19.65% | +0.45% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.83% | 21.64% | -4.81% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.94% | 21.64% | -1.70% |