XEMD.L vs. EMDV.L

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF 1D (XEMD.L) and SPDR S&P Emerging Markets Dividend Aristocrats UCITS ETF (Dist) (EMDV.L).

XEMD.L and EMDV.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. XEMD.L is a passively managed fund by Xtrackers that tracks the performance of the MSCI EM NR USD. It was launched on Nov 3, 2021. EMDV.L is a passively managed fund by State Street that tracks the performance of the MSCI EM NR USD. It was launched on Oct 14, 2011. Both XEMD.L and EMDV.L are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.

Performance

XEMD.L vs. EMDV.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF 1D (XEMD.L) and SPDR S&P Emerging Markets Dividend Aristocrats UCITS ETF (Dist) (EMDV.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

XEMD.L vs. EMDV.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
XEMD.L Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF 1D	5.44%	33.32%	7.21%	10.03%	-20.21%	-3.35%
EMDV.L SPDR S&P Emerging Markets Dividend Aristocrats UCITS ETF (Dist)	2.94%	2.46%	21.91%	1.44%	-3.33%	1.57%

Different Trading Currencies

XEMD.L is traded in EUR, while EMDV.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the EMDV.L values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XEMD.L achieves a 5.44% return, which is significantly higher than EMDV.L's 2.94% return.

XEMD.L

• 1D: 4.24%
• 1M: -5.82%
• YTD: 5.44%
• 6M: 8.75%
• 1Y: 34.45%
• 3Y*: 16.43%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

EMDV.L

• 1D: 1.14%
• 1M: -3.41%
• YTD: 2.94%
• 6M: 1.99%
• 1Y: 6.90%
• 3Y*: 8.52%
• 5Y*: 4.70%
• 10Y*: 5.58%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XEMD.L vs. EMDV.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

XEMD.L has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than EMDV.L's 0.55% expense ratio.

EMDV.L

SPDR S&P Emerging Markets Dividend Aristocrats UCITS ETF (Dist)

XEMD.L

Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF 1D

Return for Risk

XEMD.L vs. EMDV.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XEMD.L

XEMD.L Risk / Return Rank: 81
XEMD.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 86
XEMD.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 85
XEMD.L Omega Ratio Rank: 84
XEMD.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 76
XEMD.L Martin Ratio Rank: 74

EMDV.L

EMDV.L Risk / Return Rank: 40
EMDV.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 42
EMDV.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 40
EMDV.L Omega Ratio Rank: 35
EMDV.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 48
EMDV.L Martin Ratio Rank: 35

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XEMD.L vs. EMDV.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF 1D (XEMD.L) and SPDR S&P Emerging Markets Dividend Aristocrats UCITS ETF (Dist) (EMDV.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	XEMD.L	EMDV.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.84	0.48	+1.36
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.38	0.73	+1.65
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.35	1.10	+0.25
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.33	0.91	+1.42
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	8.70	2.22	+6.48
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

XEMD.L vs. EMDV.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XEMD.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.84, which is higher than the EMDV.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.48. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XEMD.L and EMDV.L, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	XEMD.L	EMDV.L	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.84	0.48	+1.36
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.31	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.32	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.40	0.23	+0.17

Correlation

The correlation between XEMD.L and EMDV.L is 0.46, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

XEMD.L vs. EMDV.L - Dividend Comparison

XEMD.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.63%, while EMDV.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
XEMD.L Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF 1D	1.63%	1.63%	2.88%	2.15%	2.52%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
EMDV.L SPDR S&P Emerging Markets Dividend Aristocrats UCITS ETF (Dist)	0.00%	1.29%	4.08%	4.98%	4.45%	3.28%	3.19%	3.83%	3.49%	2.89%	4.15%	5.95%

Drawdowns

XEMD.L vs. EMDV.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XEMD.L drawdown since its inception was -31.57%, smaller than the maximum EMDV.L drawdown of -43.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XEMD.L and EMDV.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	XEMD.L	EMDV.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-31.57%	-48.26%	+16.69%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.23%	-8.99%	-4.24%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-15.31%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-34.93%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-9.13%	-6.54%	-2.59%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-9.69%	-13.59%	+3.90%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.84%	3.28%	+0.56%

Volatility

XEMD.L vs. EMDV.L - Volatility Comparison

Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF 1D (XEMD.L) has a higher volatility of 8.77% compared to SPDR S&P Emerging Markets Dividend Aristocrats UCITS ETF (Dist) (EMDV.L) at 3.89%. This indicates that XEMD.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EMDV.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	XEMD.L	EMDV.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	8.77%	3.89%	+4.88%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	14.12%	8.72%	+5.40%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	19.65%	14.45%	+5.20%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	21.64%	15.15%	+6.49%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.64%	17.50%	+4.14%