PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EMXC.L vs. GLD
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

EMXC.L vs. GLD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Lyxor MSCI Emerging Markets Ex China UCITS ETF - Acc (EMXC.L) and SPDR Gold Shares (GLD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

EMXC.L vs. GLD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
EMXC.L
Lyxor MSCI Emerging Markets Ex China UCITS ETF - Acc
4.08%35.24%3.14%18.63%-18.80%8.46%13.13%4.89%
GLD
SPDR Gold Shares
10.30%44.25%35.02%9.31%5.38%3.02%14.53%7.17%
Different Trading Currencies

EMXC.L is traded in EUR, while GLD is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the GLD values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EMXC.L achieves a 4.08% return, which is significantly lower than GLD's 6.95% return.


EMXC.L

1D
0.28%
1M
-13.24%
YTD
4.08%
6M
14.63%
1Y
42.96%
3Y*
18.77%
5Y*
7.76%
10Y*

GLD

1D
0.00%
1M
-11.82%
YTD
6.95%
6M
19.11%
1Y
35.47%
3Y*
28.77%
5Y*
21.28%
10Y*
13.40%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


EMXC.L vs. GLD - Expense Ratio Comparison

EMXC.L has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than GLD's 0.40% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

EMXC.L vs. GLD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EMXC.L
EMXC.L Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
EMXC.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EMXC.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
EMXC.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
EMXC.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
EMXC.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank

GLD
GLD Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
GLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
GLD Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
GLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
GLD Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EMXC.L vs. GLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lyxor MSCI Emerging Markets Ex China UCITS ETF - Acc (EMXC.L) and SPDR Gold Shares (GLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EMXC.LGLDDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.19

1.39

+0.79

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.76

1.82

+0.94

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.40

1.28

+0.12

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.92

2.20

+0.72

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

11.54

7.62

+3.92

EMXC.L vs. GLD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EMXC.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.19, which is higher than the GLD Sharpe Ratio of 1.39. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EMXC.L and GLD, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EMXC.LGLDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.19

1.39

+0.79

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.47

1.30

-0.84

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.91

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.46

0.66

-0.20

Correlation

The correlation between EMXC.L and GLD is 0.07, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

EMXC.L vs. GLD - Dividend Comparison

Neither EMXC.L nor GLD has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

EMXC.L vs. GLD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EMXC.L drawdown since its inception was -40.52%, which is greater than GLD's maximum drawdown of -37.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EMXC.L and GLD.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


EMXC.LGLDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-40.52%

-45.56%

+5.04%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.14%

-19.21%

+5.07%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.58%

-21.03%

-7.55%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-22.00%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-13.90%

-13.23%

-0.67%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.08%

-16.17%

+7.09%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.57%

5.20%

-1.63%

Volatility

EMXC.L vs. GLD - Volatility Comparison

Lyxor MSCI Emerging Markets Ex China UCITS ETF - Acc (EMXC.L) and SPDR Gold Shares (GLD) have volatilities of 10.29% and 10.34%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


EMXC.LGLDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.29%

10.34%

-0.05%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.92%

23.12%

-8.20%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.59%

25.61%

-6.02%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.70%

16.43%

+0.27%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.86%

14.79%

+5.07%