PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
XEMD.L vs. GSBD
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Key characteristics


XEMD.LGSBD
YTD Return14.94%-1.94%
1Y Return22.79%2.75%
Sharpe Ratio1.170.22
Sortino Ratio1.840.38
Omega Ratio1.211.05
Calmar Ratio0.810.20
Martin Ratio6.550.55
Ulcer Index3.01%5.55%
Daily Std Dev16.25%14.02%
Max Drawdown-31.55%-62.67%
Current Drawdown-3.44%-13.13%

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.2

The correlation between XEMD.L and GSBD is 0.21, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Performance

XEMD.L vs. GSBD - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, XEMD.L achieves a 14.94% return, which is significantly higher than GSBD's -1.94% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%5.00%10.00%15.00%20.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
9.39%
-10.80%
XEMD.L
GSBD

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

XEMD.L vs. GSBD - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF 1D (XEMD.L) and Goldman Sachs BDC, Inc. (GSBD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XEMD.L
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for XEMD.L, currently valued at 1.28, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.001.28
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for XEMD.L, currently valued at 1.99, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.001.99
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for XEMD.L, currently valued at 1.24, compared to the broader market1.001.502.002.503.001.24
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for XEMD.L, currently valued at 0.99, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.000.99
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for XEMD.L, currently valued at 6.44, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.00120.006.44
GSBD
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for GSBD, currently valued at -0.07, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.00-0.07
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for GSBD, currently valued at -0.01, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.00-0.01
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for GSBD, currently valued at 1.00, compared to the broader market1.001.502.002.503.001.00
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for GSBD, currently valued at -0.07, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.00-0.07
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for GSBD, currently valued at -0.18, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.00120.00-0.18

XEMD.L vs. GSBD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XEMD.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.17, which is higher than the GSBD Sharpe Ratio of 0.22. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XEMD.L and GSBD, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.000.501.001.502.002.50JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
1.28
-0.07
XEMD.L
GSBD

Dividends

XEMD.L vs. GSBD - Dividend Comparison

XEMD.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.57%, less than GSBD's 13.72% yield.


TTM202320222021202020192018201720162015
XEMD.L
Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF 1D
2.57%2.15%2.52%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
GSBD
Goldman Sachs BDC, Inc.
13.72%12.29%13.12%10.18%9.41%8.46%9.79%8.12%7.65%9.45%

Drawdowns

XEMD.L vs. GSBD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XEMD.L drawdown since its inception was -31.55%, smaller than the maximum GSBD drawdown of -62.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XEMD.L and GSBD. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-7.16%
-13.13%
XEMD.L
GSBD

Volatility

XEMD.L vs. GSBD - Volatility Comparison

Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF 1D (XEMD.L) has a higher volatility of 6.10% compared to Goldman Sachs BDC, Inc. (GSBD) at 5.02%. This indicates that XEMD.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GSBD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


2.00%3.00%4.00%5.00%6.00%7.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
6.10%
5.02%
XEMD.L
GSBD