EMXC.L vs. AEME.L
Compare and contrast key facts about Lyxor MSCI Emerging Markets Ex China UCITS ETF - Acc (EMXC.L) and Amundi Index MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF DR (C) (AEME.L).
EMXC.L and AEME.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. EMXC.L is a passively managed fund by Amundi that tracks the performance of the MSCI EM NR USD. It was launched on Jun 20, 2019. AEME.L is a passively managed fund by Amundi that tracks the performance of the MSCI EM NR USD. It was launched on Jun 29, 2016. Both EMXC.L and AEME.L are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
EMXC.L vs. AEME.L - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
EMXC.L vs. AEME.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EMXC.L Lyxor MSCI Emerging Markets Ex China UCITS ETF - Acc | 9.06% | 35.24% | 3.14% | 18.63% | -18.80% | 4.44% |
AEME.L Amundi Index MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF DR (C) | 6.57% | 18.93% | 13.76% | 5.16% | -14.88% | -4.19% |
Different Trading Currencies
EMXC.L is traded in EUR, while AEME.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the AEME.L values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EMXC.L achieves a 9.06% return, which is significantly higher than AEME.L's 6.57% return.
EMXC.L
- 1D
- 4.79%
- 1M
- -6.73%
- YTD
- 9.06%
- 6M
- 18.83%
- 1Y
- 48.03%
- 3Y*
- 20.64%
- 5Y*
- 8.78%
- 10Y*
- —
AEME.L
- 1D
- 3.99%
- 1M
- -5.33%
- YTD
- 6.57%
- 6M
- 10.23%
- 1Y
- 26.25%
- 3Y*
- 13.90%
- 5Y*
- 4.48%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
EMXC.L vs. AEME.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
EMXC.L has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than AEME.L's 0.20% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Return for Risk
EMXC.L vs. AEME.L — Risk / Return Rank
EMXC.L
AEME.L
EMXC.L vs. AEME.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lyxor MSCI Emerging Markets Ex China UCITS ETF - Acc (EMXC.L) and Amundi Index MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF DR (C) (AEME.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EMXC.L | AEME.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.38 | 1.40 | +0.98 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.02 | 1.89 | +1.13 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.44 | 1.27 | +0.17 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.37 | 2.78 | +0.59 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.44 | 10.51 | +2.93 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EMXC.L | AEME.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.38 | 1.40 | +0.98 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.52 | 0.26 | +0.26 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.50 | 0.25 | +0.25 |
Correlation
The correlation between EMXC.L and AEME.L is 0.77, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
EMXC.L vs. AEME.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither EMXC.L nor AEME.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
EMXC.L vs. AEME.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EMXC.L drawdown since its inception was -40.52%, which is greater than AEME.L's maximum drawdown of -26.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EMXC.L and AEME.L.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| EMXC.L | AEME.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -40.52% | -40.09% | -0.43% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.14% | -13.52% | -0.62% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.58% | -37.46% | +8.88% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.78% | -9.65% | -0.13% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.08% | -18.46% | +9.38% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.54% | 3.39% | +0.15% |
Volatility
EMXC.L vs. AEME.L - Volatility Comparison
Lyxor MSCI Emerging Markets Ex China UCITS ETF - Acc (EMXC.L) has a higher volatility of 9.83% compared to Amundi Index MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF DR (C) (AEME.L) at 8.18%. This indicates that EMXC.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AEME.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| EMXC.L | AEME.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.83% | 8.18% | +1.65% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.61% | 13.68% | +1.93% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.10% | 18.64% | +1.46% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.83% | 16.88% | -0.05% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.94% | 16.98% | +2.96% |