PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
EMXC.L vs. UC79.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

EMXC.L vs. UC79.L

Last updated Jul 16, 2026
Documentation

EMXC.L (Lyxor MSCI Emerging Markets Ex China UCITS ETF - Acc) and UC79.L (UBS ETF (LU) MSCI Emerging Markets Socially Responsible UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis) are both Emerging Markets Equities funds tracking the MSCI EM NR USD, from Amundi and UBS respectively. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, EMXC.L returned 11.86%/yr vs 9.26%/yr for UC79.L. A 0.77 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. EMXC.L charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.27%/yr for UC79.L.

Performance

EMXC.L vs. UC79.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Lyxor MSCI Emerging Markets Ex China UCITS ETF - Acc (EMXC.L) and UBS ETF (LU) MSCI Emerging Markets Socially Responsible UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (UC79.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

EMXC.L is traded in EUR, while UC79.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the UC79.L values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with EMXC.L having a 30.57% return and UC79.L slightly higher at 30.65%.

EMXC.L

1D
-1.06%
1M
-7.56%
6M
24.39%
YTD
30.57%
1Y
52.69%
3Y*
24.00%
5Y*
11.86%
10Y*
—

UC79.L

1D
-0.37%
1M
-5.16%
6M
25.12%
YTD
30.65%
1Y
47.15%
3Y*
23.03%
5Y*
9.26%
10Y*
8.46%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EMXC.L vs. UC79.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
EMXC.L
Lyxor MSCI Emerging Markets Ex China UCITS ETF - Acc		30.57%35.24%3.15%18.63%-18.84%8.52%53.86%
UC79.L
UBS ETF (LU) MSCI Emerging Markets Socially Responsible UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis		30.65%20.33%16.23%3.28%-16.29%6.85%43.69%

Correlation

The correlation between EMXC.L and UC79.L is 0.87, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.87

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.80

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.77

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 4, 2020

0.77

The correlation between EMXC.L and UC79.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.77 to 0.87 - a consistent structural relationship.

EMXC.L vs. UC79.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
EMXC.L
UC79.L

Technology

37.8%
45.8%

Healthcare

17.6%
3.0%

Consumer Cyclical

14.0%
9.9%

Industrials

8.6%
6.2%

Consumer Defensive

8.2%
2.6%

Communication Services

6.8%
8.1%

Financial Services

3.7%
19.3%

Basic Materials

1.8%
2.7%

Energy

0.9%
0.1%

Real Estate

0.4%
1.2%

Utilities

0.1%
1.0%

Technology

EMXC.L
37.8%
UC79.L
45.8%

Healthcare

EMXC.L
17.6%
UC79.L
3.0%

Consumer Cyclical

EMXC.L
14.0%
UC79.L
9.9%

Industrials

EMXC.L
8.6%
UC79.L
6.2%

Consumer Defensive

EMXC.L
8.2%
UC79.L
2.6%

Communication Services

EMXC.L
6.8%
UC79.L
8.1%

Financial Services

EMXC.L
3.7%
UC79.L
19.3%

Basic Materials

EMXC.L
1.8%
UC79.L
2.7%

Energy

EMXC.L
0.9%
UC79.L
0.1%

Real Estate

EMXC.L
0.4%
UC79.L
1.2%

Utilities

EMXC.L
0.1%
UC79.L
1.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

Lyxor MSCI Emerging Markets Ex China UCITS ETF - Acc

UBS ETF (LU) MSCI Emerging Markets Socially Responsible UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis

Often compared with EMXC.L:
EMXC.L vs. FRDMEMXC.L vs. VWOEMXC.L vs. HEMC.LEMXC.L vs. FEM.LEMXC.L vs. GLDEMXC.L vs. EIMI.LEMXC.L vs. XEMD.L
Often compared with UC79.L:
UC79.L vs. HMEF.LUC79.L vs. EMV.LUC79.L vs. COPPUC79.L vs. EUFM.LUC79.L vs. 5ESG.LUC79.L vs. V3AB.LUC79.L vs. HDEM.L

Return for Risk

EMXC.L vs. UC79.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
EMXC.L
EMXC.L Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
EMXC.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EMXC.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
EMXC.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
EMXC.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
EMXC.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank
UC79.L
UC79.L Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
UC79.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UC79.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
UC79.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
UC79.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
UC79.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EMXC.L vs. UC79.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lyxor MSCI Emerging Markets Ex China UCITS ETF - Acc (EMXC.L) and UBS ETF (LU) MSCI Emerging Markets Socially Responsible UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (UC79.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

EMXC.LUC79.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
2.12
2.26

-0.14

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
2.73
3.01

-0.28

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

1.40

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.71

4.83

-1.12

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.17

13.99

-1.82

EMXC.L vs. UC79.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EMXC.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.12, which is comparable to the UC79.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.26. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EMXC.L and UC79.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Drawdowns

EMXC.L vs. UC79.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EMXC.L drawdown since its inception was -28.58%, smaller than the maximum UC79.L drawdown of -51.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EMXC.L and UC79.L.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

EMXC.LUC79.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-28.58%

-51.25%

+22.67%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.13%

-9.72%

-4.41%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.31%

-19.21%

-1.10%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.58%

-24.47%

-4.11%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

—

-36.28%

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-10.81%

-8.62%

-2.19%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.82%

-24.69%

+16.87%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.32%

3.36%

+0.96%

Volatility

EMXC.L vs. UC79.L - Volatility Comparison

Lyxor MSCI Emerging Markets Ex China UCITS ETF - Acc (EMXC.L) has a higher volatility of 10.66% compared to UBS ETF (LU) MSCI Emerging Markets Socially Responsible UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (UC79.L) at 8.83%. This indicates that EMXC.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than UC79.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

EMXC.LUC79.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.66%

8.83%

+1.83%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

22.95%

18.28%

+4.67%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

24.77%

20.78%

+3.99%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.50%

17.96%

+0.54%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.46%

18.86%

-0.40%

EMXC.L vs. UC79.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

EMXC.L has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than UC79.L's 0.27% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

EMXC.L vs. UC79.L - Dividend Comparison

EMXC.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while UC79.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.67%.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EMXC.L
Lyxor MSCI Emerging Markets Ex China UCITS ETF - Acc		0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
UC79.L
UBS ETF (LU) MSCI Emerging Markets Socially Responsible UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis		1.67%2.14%1.79%2.38%2.07%1.35%1.80%2.11%2.11%1.97%2.15%1.60%

Frequently Asked Questions

EMXC.L and UC79.L have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, EMXC.L is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

EMXC.L is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.27% for UC79.L.

Both ETFs track MSCI EM NR USD. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and UBS. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for EMXC.L and 0.27% for UC79.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EMXC.L and UC79.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer