PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
AEME.L vs. ^GSPC
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Drawdowns
Volatility

Key characteristics


AEME.L^GSPC
YTD Return15.89%22.95%
1Y Return27.39%37.09%
3Y Return (Ann)-1.43%9.10%
Sharpe Ratio1.502.89
Sortino Ratio2.123.84
Omega Ratio1.311.53
Calmar Ratio0.852.54
Martin Ratio10.2018.73
Ulcer Index2.83%1.92%
Daily Std Dev19.26%12.41%
Max Drawdown-40.09%-56.78%
Current Drawdown-13.51%0.00%

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.4

The correlation between AEME.L and ^GSPC is 0.40, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Performance

AEME.L vs. ^GSPC - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, AEME.L achieves a 15.89% return, which is significantly lower than ^GSPC's 22.95% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


-20.00%0.00%20.00%40.00%60.00%MayJuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctober
-8.91%
53.27%
AEME.L
^GSPC

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

AEME.L vs. ^GSPC - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi Index MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF DR (C) (AEME.L) and S&P 500 (^GSPC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


AEME.L
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for AEME.L, currently valued at 1.57, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.001.57
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for AEME.L, currently valued at 2.21, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.002.21
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for AEME.L, currently valued at 1.33, compared to the broader market1.001.502.002.503.001.33
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for AEME.L, currently valued at 0.89, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.000.89
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for AEME.L, currently valued at 10.68, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.0010.68
^GSPC
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for ^GSPC, currently valued at 3.45, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.003.45
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for ^GSPC, currently valued at 4.55, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.004.55
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for ^GSPC, currently valued at 1.65, compared to the broader market1.001.502.002.503.001.65
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for ^GSPC, currently valued at 2.95, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.002.95
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for ^GSPC, currently valued at 22.31, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.0022.31

AEME.L vs. ^GSPC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AEME.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.50, which is lower than the ^GSPC Sharpe Ratio of 2.89. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AEME.L and ^GSPC, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.000.501.001.502.002.503.003.50MayJuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctober
1.57
3.45
AEME.L
^GSPC

Drawdowns

AEME.L vs. ^GSPC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AEME.L drawdown since its inception was -40.09%, smaller than the maximum ^GSPC drawdown of -56.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AEME.L and ^GSPC. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-25.00%-20.00%-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%MayJuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctober
-13.51%
0
AEME.L
^GSPC

Volatility

AEME.L vs. ^GSPC - Volatility Comparison

Amundi Index MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF DR (C) (AEME.L) has a higher volatility of 5.89% compared to S&P 500 (^GSPC) at 2.56%. This indicates that AEME.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ^GSPC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


2.00%3.00%4.00%5.00%6.00%MayJuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctober
5.89%
2.56%
AEME.L
^GSPC