AEME.L vs. QQQ
Compare and contrast key facts about Amundi Index MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF DR (C) (AEME.L) and Invesco QQQ (QQQ).
AEME.L and QQQ are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. AEME.L is a passively managed fund by Amundi that tracks the performance of the MSCI EM NR USD. It was launched on Jun 29, 2016. QQQ is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the NASDAQ-100 Index. It was launched on Mar 10, 1999. Both AEME.L and QQQ are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: AEME.L or QQQ.
Performance
AEME.L vs. QQQ - Performance Comparison
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AEME.L achieves a 7.87% return, which is significantly lower than QQQ's 21.78% return.
AEME.L
7.87%
-6.92%
-1.49%
12.88%
N/A
N/A
QQQ
21.78%
1.15%
10.25%
29.54%
20.42%
17.95%
Key characteristics
| AEME.L | QQQ | |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio | 0.84 | 1.70 |
| Sortino Ratio | 1.31 | 2.29 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.16 | 1.31 |
| Calmar Ratio | 0.43 | 2.19 |
| Martin Ratio | 4.01 | 7.96 |
| Ulcer Index | 3.21% | 3.72% |
| Daily Std Dev | 19.19% | 17.39% |
| Max Drawdown | -40.09% | -82.98% |
| Current Drawdown | -19.50% | -3.42% |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
AEME.L vs. QQQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both AEME.L and QQQ have an expense ratio of 0.20%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Correlation
The correlation between AEME.L and QQQ is 0.40, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
AEME.L vs. QQQ - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi Index MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF DR (C) (AEME.L) and Invesco QQQ (QQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
AEME.L vs. QQQ - Dividend Comparison
AEME.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while QQQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.61%.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AEME.L Amundi Index MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF DR (C) | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
QQQ Invesco QQQ | 0.61% | 0.62% | 0.80% | 0.43% | 0.55% | 0.74% | 0.91% | 0.84% | 1.06% | 0.99% | 1.41% | 1.02% |
Drawdowns
AEME.L vs. QQQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AEME.L drawdown since its inception was -40.09%, smaller than the maximum QQQ drawdown of -82.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AEME.L and QQQ. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
AEME.L vs. QQQ - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Amundi Index MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF DR (C) (AEME.L) is 4.99%, while Invesco QQQ (QQQ) has a volatility of 5.62%. This indicates that AEME.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QQQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.