PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
EMVL.L vs. HMEF.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

EMVL.L vs. HMEF.L

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

EMVL.L (iShares Edge MSCI EM Value Factor UCITS ETF USD(Acc)) and HMEF.L (HSBC MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF USD) are both Emerging Markets Equities funds tracking the MSCI EM NR USD, from iShares and HSBC respectively. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, EMVL.L returned 16.16%/yr vs 4.61%/yr for HMEF.L. Their correlation of 0.84 suggests significant overlap in exposure. EMVL.L charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for HMEF.L.

Performance

EMVL.L vs. HMEF.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Edge MSCI EM Value Factor UCITS ETF USD(Acc) (EMVL.L) and HSBC MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF USD (HMEF.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

EMVL.L is traded in USD, while HMEF.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the HMEF.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EMVL.L achieves a 43.83% return, which is significantly higher than HMEF.L's 25.21% return.

EMVL.L

1D
-2.57%
1M
10.78%
YTD
43.83%
6M
48.06%
1Y
85.89%
3Y*
37.66%
5Y*
16.16%
10Y*
—

HMEF.L

1D
-1.61%
1M
5.62%
YTD
25.21%
6M
28.23%
1Y
49.76%
3Y*
20.79%
5Y*
4.61%
10Y*
7.68%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EMVL.L vs. HMEF.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
EMVL.L
iShares Edge MSCI EM Value Factor UCITS ETF USD(Acc)		43.83%43.13%14.48%18.38%-16.29%5.29%7.16%17.77%
HMEF.L
HSBC MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF USD		25.21%31.08%4.66%5.11%-21.94%-4.97%16.13%15.70%

Correlation

The correlation between EMVL.L and HMEF.L is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.86

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.89

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.88

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2019

0.84

The correlation between EMVL.L and HMEF.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.84 to 0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.

EMVL.L vs. HMEF.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
EMVL.L
HMEF.L

Technology

44.7%
42.9%

Financial Services

13.8%
17.8%

Consumer Cyclical

11.5%
8.7%

Basic Materials

10.0%
5.9%

Energy

8.1%
3.5%

Industrials

2.7%
6.8%

Communication Services

2.5%
6.2%

Real Estate

1.8%
1.0%

Healthcare

1.7%
2.6%

Utilities

1.4%
1.9%

Consumer Defensive

1.1%
2.7%

Technology

EMVL.L
44.7%
HMEF.L
42.9%

Financial Services

EMVL.L
13.8%
HMEF.L
17.8%

Consumer Cyclical

EMVL.L
11.5%
HMEF.L
8.7%

Basic Materials

EMVL.L
10.0%
HMEF.L
5.9%

Energy

EMVL.L
8.1%
HMEF.L
3.5%

Industrials

EMVL.L
2.7%
HMEF.L
6.8%

Communication Services

EMVL.L
2.5%
HMEF.L
6.2%

Real Estate

EMVL.L
1.8%
HMEF.L
1.0%

Healthcare

EMVL.L
1.7%
HMEF.L
2.6%

Utilities

EMVL.L
1.4%
HMEF.L
1.9%

Consumer Defensive

EMVL.L
1.1%
HMEF.L
2.7%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

iShares Edge MSCI EM Value Factor UCITS ETF USD(Acc)

HSBC MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF USD

Often compared with EMVL.L:
EMVL.L vs. EIMI.LEMVL.L vs. AVESEMVL.L vs. AVEMEMVL.L vs. DGSE.LEMVL.L vs. HSEF.LEMVL.L vs. VWOEMVL.L vs. IWDA.L
Often compared with HMEF.L:
HMEF.L vs. VFEG.LHMEF.L vs. IEEM.LHMEF.L vs. AIAI.LHMEF.L vs. EMIM.LHMEF.L vs. VWRL.LHMEF.L vs. EQQQ.LHMEF.L vs. HMWO.L

Return for Risk

EMVL.L vs. HMEF.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
EMVL.L
EMVL.L Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
EMVL.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EMVL.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
EMVL.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
EMVL.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
EMVL.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank
HMEF.L
HMEF.L Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
HMEF.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HMEF.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
HMEF.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
HMEF.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
HMEF.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EMVL.L vs. HMEF.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Edge MSCI EM Value Factor UCITS ETF USD(Acc) (EMVL.L) and HSBC MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF USD (HMEF.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

EMVL.LHMEF.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
4.07
2.61

+1.46

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
4.83
3.49

+1.34

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.69

1.47

+0.22

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

7.25

3.79

+3.47

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

25.10

13.67

+11.43

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

EMVL.L vs. HMEF.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EMVL.L Sharpe Ratio is 4.07, which is higher than the HMEF.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.61. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EMVL.L and HMEF.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

EMVL.LHMEF.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.07

2.61

+1.46

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.81

0.25

+0.56

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

—

0.40

—

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.81

0.19

+0.62

Drawdowns

EMVL.L vs. HMEF.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EMVL.L drawdown since its inception was -34.95%, smaller than the maximum HMEF.L drawdown of -42.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EMVL.L and HMEF.L.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

EMVL.LHMEF.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.95%

-42.58%

+7.63%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.65%

-13.08%

+1.43%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.43%

-17.13%

+0.70%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.57%

-39.72%

+5.15%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

—

-42.58%

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.20%

-2.86%

-1.34%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.98%

-16.39%

+6.41%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.39%

3.63%

-0.24%

Volatility

EMVL.L vs. HMEF.L - Volatility Comparison

iShares Edge MSCI EM Value Factor UCITS ETF USD(Acc) (EMVL.L) has a higher volatility of 9.56% compared to HSBC MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF USD (HMEF.L) at 8.21%. This indicates that EMVL.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HMEF.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

EMVL.LHMEF.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.56%

8.21%

+1.35%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.52%

16.33%

+1.19%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.79%

19.00%

+1.79%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.00%

18.66%

+1.34%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.24%

19.41%

+2.83%

EMVL.L vs. HMEF.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

EMVL.L has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than HMEF.L's 0.15% expense ratio.

Dividends

EMVL.L vs. HMEF.L - Dividend Comparison

EMVL.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while HMEF.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.02%.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EMVL.L
iShares Edge MSCI EM Value Factor UCITS ETF USD(Acc)		0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
HMEF.L
HSBC MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF USD		0.02%0.02%0.02%0.03%0.03%0.02%0.02%0.02%0.02%0.02%0.02%0.02%

Frequently Asked Questions

EMVL.L and HMEF.L have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, HMEF.L is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

HMEF.L is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for EMVL.L.

Both ETFs track MSCI EM NR USD. They also come from different issuers: iShares and HSBC. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for EMVL.L and 0.15% for HMEF.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EMVL.L and HMEF.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer