EMVL.L vs. HSEF.L
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares Edge MSCI EM Value Factor UCITS ETF USD(Acc) (EMVL.L) and HSBC Emerging Market Sustainable Equity UCITS ETF USD (HSEF.L).
EMVL.L and HSEF.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. EMVL.L is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI EM NR USD. It was launched on Dec 6, 2018. HSEF.L is a passively managed fund by HSBC that tracks the performance of the MSCI EM NR USD. It was launched on Aug 27, 2020. Both EMVL.L and HSEF.L are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
EMVL.L vs. HSEF.L - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
EMVL.L vs. HSEF.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EMVL.L iShares Edge MSCI EM Value Factor UCITS ETF USD(Acc) | 12.17% | 43.13% | 14.48% | 18.38% | -16.29% | 5.29% | 14.49% |
HSEF.L HSBC Emerging Market Sustainable Equity UCITS ETF USD | -0.36% | 29.97% | 15.07% | 3.88% | -18.15% | 0.89% | 13.98% |
Different Trading Currencies
EMVL.L is traded in USD, while HSEF.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the HSEF.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EMVL.L achieves a 12.17% return, which is significantly higher than HSEF.L's -0.25% return.
EMVL.L
- 1D
- 3.53%
- 1M
- -6.33%
- YTD
- 12.17%
- 6M
- 23.32%
- 1Y
- 53.79%
- 3Y*
- 27.33%
- 5Y*
- 11.54%
- 10Y*
- —
HSEF.L
- 1D
- 0.72%
- 1M
- -8.96%
- YTD
- -0.25%
- 6M
- 1.67%
- 1Y
- 25.69%
- 3Y*
- 14.82%
- 5Y*
- 3.94%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
EMVL.L vs. HSEF.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
EMVL.L has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than HSEF.L's 0.18% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
EMVL.L vs. HSEF.L — Risk / Return Rank
EMVL.L
HSEF.L
EMVL.L vs. HSEF.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Edge MSCI EM Value Factor UCITS ETF USD(Acc) (EMVL.L) and HSBC Emerging Market Sustainable Equity UCITS ETF USD (HSEF.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EMVL.L | HSEF.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.63 | 1.42 | +1.21 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.18 | 1.82 | +1.36 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.47 | 1.27 | +0.20 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.87 | 1.88 | +2.99 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 17.74 | 6.96 | +10.78 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EMVL.L | HSEF.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.63 | 1.42 | +1.21 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.59 | 0.22 | +0.37 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.65 | 0.39 | +0.25 |
Correlation
The correlation between EMVL.L and HSEF.L is 0.85, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
EMVL.L vs. HSEF.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither EMVL.L nor HSEF.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
EMVL.L vs. HSEF.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EMVL.L drawdown since its inception was -34.95%, roughly equal to the maximum HSEF.L drawdown of -36.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EMVL.L and HSEF.L.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| EMVL.L | HSEF.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.95% | -23.33% | -11.62% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.67% | -11.82% | -0.85% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -34.95% | -19.36% | -15.59% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.54% | -8.21% | -0.33% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.19% | -9.54% | -0.65% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.20% | 3.36% | -0.16% |
Volatility
EMVL.L vs. HSEF.L - Volatility Comparison
iShares Edge MSCI EM Value Factor UCITS ETF USD(Acc) (EMVL.L) has a higher volatility of 7.90% compared to HSBC Emerging Market Sustainable Equity UCITS ETF USD (HSEF.L) at 6.91%. This indicates that EMVL.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HSEF.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| EMVL.L | HSEF.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.90% | 6.91% | +0.99% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.35% | 12.02% | +3.33% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.25% | 18.00% | +2.25% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.48% | 17.79% | +1.69% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.02% | 17.76% | +4.26% |