PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EMTY vs. SNPD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EMTY vs. SNPD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares Decline of the Retail Store ETF (EMTY) and Xtrackers S&P ESG Dividend Aristocrats ETF (SNPD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EMTY achieves a -2.27% return, which is significantly lower than SNPD's 15.04% return.


EMTY

1D
0.53%
1M
-0.72%
6M
2.65%
YTD
-2.27%
1Y
-0.27%
3Y*
-3.37%
5Y*
-3.08%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
-11.36%

SNPD

1D
-0.56%
1M
0.85%
6M
7.73%
YTD
15.04%
1Y
20.01%
3Y*
8.64%
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
8.91%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$18.44K$30.35K$49.16K
$14.25K$34.67K$29.79K

EMTY vs. SNPD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
EMTY
ProShares Decline of the Retail Store ETF
-2.27%-1.76%-4.13%0.27%-1.97%
SNPD
Xtrackers S&P ESG Dividend Aristocrats ETF
15.04%6.66%5.41%2.68%3.49%

Correlation

The correlation between EMTY and SNPD is -0.71, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

-0.71

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

-0.71

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 9, 2022

-0.73

The correlation between EMTY and SNPD has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -0.73 to -0.71 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EMTY vs. SNPD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

EMTY
EMTY Risk / Return Rank: 1010
Overall Rank
EMTY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1010
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EMTY Sortino Ratio Rank: 1010
Sortino Ratio Rank
EMTY Omega Ratio Rank: 1010
Omega Ratio Rank
EMTY Calmar Ratio Rank: 1010
Calmar Ratio Rank
EMTY Martin Ratio Rank: 1010
Martin Ratio Rank

SNPD
SNPD Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
SNPD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SNPD Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
SNPD Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
SNPD Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
SNPD Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

EMTY vs. SNPD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Decline of the Retail Store ETF (EMTY) and Xtrackers S&P ESG Dividend Aristocrats ETF (SNPD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


EMTYSNPDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.75

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.49

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.01

1.29

-0.28

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.04

2.27

-2.32

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.09

6.79

-6.88

EMTY vs. SNPD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EMTY Sharpe Ratio is -0.03, which is lower than the SNPD Sharpe Ratio of 1.72. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EMTY and SNPD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

EMTY vs. SNPD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EMTY drawdown since its inception was -77.62%, which is greater than SNPD's maximum drawdown of -15.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EMTY and SNPD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EMTYSNPDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-77.62%

-15.80%

-61.82%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.91%

-8.68%

-5.23%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-30.83%

-15.80%

-15.03%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.83%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-75.61%

-2.65%

-72.96%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-54.65%

-3.81%

-50.84%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.54%

2.90%

+3.64%

Volatility

EMTY vs. SNPD - Volatility Comparison

ProShares Decline of the Retail Store ETF (EMTY) has a higher volatility of 6.54% compared to Xtrackers S&P ESG Dividend Aristocrats ETF (SNPD) at 4.52%. This indicates that EMTY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SNPD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EMTYSNPDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.54%

4.52%

+2.02%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.79%

8.86%

+4.93%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.41%

11.50%

+6.91%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.46%

13.15%

+9.31%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.60%

13.15%

+12.45%

EMTY vs. SNPD - Expense Ratio Comparison

EMTY has a 0.66% expense ratio, which is higher than SNPD's 0.15% expense ratio.


Dividends

EMTY vs. SNPD - Dividend Comparison

EMTY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.33%, more than SNPD's 3.16% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
EMTY
ProShares Decline of the Retail Store ETF
3.33%3.83%6.00%4.41%0.65%0.00%0.07%0.82%0.62%0.03%
SNPD
Xtrackers S&P ESG Dividend Aristocrats ETF
3.16%3.10%2.78%2.63%0.57%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


EMTY and SNPD have a correlation of -0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EMTY has higher volatility (6.54%) compared to SNPD (4.52%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EMTY dropped -77.62% vs SNPD's -15.80%.

On 3-year performance, SNPD leads with 8.64% vs -3.37% for EMTY. On fees, SNPD is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, SNPD has been the lower-risk option at 4.52%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, SNPD has performed better with a 8.64% return vs -3.37%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SNPD is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.66% for EMTY.

EMTY has the higher dividend yield at 3.33%, compared with 3.16% for SNPD.

EMTY is categorized as Inverse Equities, while SNPD is Mid Cap Value Equities. EMTY tracks Solactive-ProShares Bricks and Mortar Retail Store Index (-100%), while SNPD tracks S&P ESG High Yield Dividend Aristocrats Index. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.66% for EMTY and 0.15% for SNPD.

SNPD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.72 vs -0.03), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EMTY and SNPD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer