PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EMTL vs. VEMY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EMTL vs. VEMY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR DoubleLine Emerging Markets Fixed Income ETF (EMTL) and Virtus Stone Harbor Emerging Markets High Yield Bond ETF (VEMY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EMTL achieves a 0.74% return, which is significantly lower than VEMY's 5.89% return.


EMTL

1D
-0.09%
1M
0.49%
YTD
0.74%
6M
0.89%
1Y
5.61%
3Y*
7.09%
5Y*
1.79%
10Y*
3.38%

VEMY

1D
-0.17%
1M
1.68%
YTD
5.89%
6M
6.65%
1Y
18.61%
3Y*
15.75%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EMTL vs. VEMY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
EMTL
SPDR DoubleLine Emerging Markets Fixed Income ETF
0.74%8.27%5.86%9.60%-1.46%
VEMY
Virtus Stone Harbor Emerging Markets High Yield Bond ETF
5.89%15.27%13.48%14.45%-1.08%

Correlation

The correlation between EMTL and VEMY is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.64

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.68

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 14, 2022

0.67

The correlation between EMTL and VEMY has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.64 to 0.68 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EMTL vs. VEMY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EMTL
EMTL Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
EMTL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EMTL Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
EMTL Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
EMTL Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
EMTL Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank

VEMY
VEMY Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
VEMY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VEMY Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
VEMY Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
VEMY Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
VEMY Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EMTL vs. VEMY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR DoubleLine Emerging Markets Fixed Income ETF (EMTL) and Virtus Stone Harbor Emerging Markets High Yield Bond ETF (VEMY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EMTLVEMYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.55

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.99

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.51

1.63

-0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.82

4.67

-1.85

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.06

22.18

-12.12

EMTL vs. VEMY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EMTL Sharpe Ratio is 2.54, which is comparable to the VEMY Sharpe Ratio of 3.09. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EMTL and VEMY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EMTLVEMYDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.54

3.09

-0.55

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.37

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.73

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.74

1.83

-1.09

Drawdowns

EMTL vs. VEMY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EMTL drawdown since its inception was -22.91%, which is greater than VEMY's maximum drawdown of -8.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EMTL and VEMY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EMTLVEMYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-22.91%

-8.77%

-14.14%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.00%

-4.00%

+2.00%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-3.79%

-6.57%

+2.78%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.91%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-22.91%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.09%

-0.17%

+0.08%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.83%

-1.30%

-2.53%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.56%

0.84%

-0.28%

Volatility

EMTL vs. VEMY - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SPDR DoubleLine Emerging Markets Fixed Income ETF (EMTL) is 0.67%, while Virtus Stone Harbor Emerging Markets High Yield Bond ETF (VEMY) has a volatility of 1.60%. This indicates that EMTL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VEMY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EMTLVEMYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.67%

1.60%

-0.93%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.65%

4.65%

-3.00%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.22%

6.05%

-3.83%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.88%

7.63%

-2.75%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.67%

7.63%

-2.96%

EMTL vs. VEMY - Expense Ratio Comparison

EMTL has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than VEMY's 0.58% expense ratio.


Dividends

EMTL vs. VEMY - Dividend Comparison

EMTL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.95%, less than VEMY's 8.38% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
EMTL
SPDR DoubleLine Emerging Markets Fixed Income ETF
4.95%5.09%5.34%4.78%4.19%5.43%3.28%3.96%3.35%4.16%8.87%
VEMY
Virtus Stone Harbor Emerging Markets High Yield Bond ETF
8.38%8.89%10.28%9.55%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


EMTL and VEMY have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VEMY has higher volatility (1.60%) compared to EMTL (0.67%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EMTL dropped -22.91% vs VEMY's -8.77%.

On 3-year performance, VEMY leads with 15.75% vs 7.09% for EMTL. On fees, VEMY is cheaper at 0.58% per year. On volatility, EMTL has been the lower-risk option at 0.67%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, VEMY has performed better with a 15.75% return vs 7.09%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VEMY is cheaper with a 0.58% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for EMTL.

VEMY has the higher dividend yield at 8.38%, compared with 4.95% for EMTL.

They also come from different issuers: State Street and Virtus. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for EMTL and 0.58% for VEMY.

VEMY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.09 vs 2.54), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EMTL and VEMY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer